Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2022, 05:23 PM   #1
Cal-to-NH
Senior Member
 
Cal-to-NH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 110
Thanks: 15
Thanked 55 Times in 26 Posts
Default Draft

Here is a draft of the STR ordinance: https://www.gilfordnh.org/file/2427/..._final_PDF.pdf

It looks very much like what the State of NH is trying to put in place state-wide.
Looks like that first inspection, septic system inspection, fire and safety issues, ability to remove rubbish, etc... put a pretty healthy burden on the permit applicant.

It also states explicitly that there are a number of infractions that will cause the permit to be revoked. The infractions seem reasonable as well.

I agree with Stevengilford. Some on this forum will read it and say this amounts to absolutely nothing (some already have!). Others will say if this is truly and competently enforced, that it should do the trick, and that's "Their read".
Cal-to-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2022, 06:05 PM   #2
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,422
Thanks: 3
Thanked 600 Times in 496 Posts
Default

History tells us it does not work.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2022, 06:51 PM   #3
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,401
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,022 Times in 632 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal-to-NH View Post
Here is a draft of the STR ordinance: https://www.gilfordnh.org/file/2427/..._final_PDF.pdf

It looks very much like what the State of NH is trying to put in place state-wide.
Looks like that first inspection, septic system inspection, fire and safety issues, ability to remove rubbish, etc... put a pretty healthy burden on the permit applicant.

It also states explicitly that there are a number of infractions that will cause the permit to be revoked. The infractions seem reasonable as well.

I agree with Stevengilford. Some on this forum will read it and say this amounts to absolutely nothing (some already have!). Others will say if this is truly and competently enforced, that it should do the trick, and that's "Their read".
Not accurate on people calling this absolutely nothing--we called the state allowing towns to do what towns already have the right to do, absolutely nothing.

But focusing on the issues--this looks pretty good for what's in the document, but without knowing Gilford's definition of noise, as referenced in the link, it's hard to know if this is meaningful. I hope others know the answer here.

One other thing I infer from the document and some comments above--the issue is not small homes renting to a single family of four, for example. It's mid-size or larger homes with groups of adults having vacation fun night after night. Understandable
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2022, 07:26 PM   #4
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,422
Thanks: 3
Thanked 600 Times in 496 Posts
Default

The nature of the beast is to get around restrictions.
It is one of the things that capitalism does very well given time.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (01-22-2022)
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.15360 seconds