Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Covid-19 Discussions & Information
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2020, 12:11 PM   #1
Pam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 63
Thanks: 22
Thanked 58 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
I have never worn a mask in a grocery store or anywhere else for that matter, except when I go into my office in Boston and when I've gone to the dentist and doctor because I have to. It is all nonsense. Prior to the so-called pandemic, I was respectful of other people. Nothing has changed. Generally speaking, I don't invade spaces, and try real hard not to sneeze, cough, breath, etc. on other people when in public. You are worried about masks being worn. Are you as worried about other people picking up and replacing items that you eventually touch? Are you concerned about the countless people who have touched all of the items in the store just to get them on the shelf?

I prefer to stick to Dr. Fraud's first recommendation - that masks are ineffective. You are feeding into and believing the hysteria generated by the media and social media. However, if you are scared and anxious, I recommend that you wear a mask to give you the feeling that you are being safe. As Hill stated, the rest of us are sick of the restrictions. Enough is enough. We have done our share. Let's get back to normalcy ASAP. Disappointingly, this will be impossible since the so-called pandemic has become a political issue. CNN reports that Chinese coronavirus cases are spiking in Georgia, Florida and Texas. Fake news. We learned that fighting the so-called pandemic is a joke when rioting and looting is encouraged.
You are correct that a lot isn't known about this disease. The reason that the original recommendation was not to wear masks was two fold: masks were needed for healthcare workers, and originally, it was not known that the virus was spread through aerosol transmission. It's understandable that you're sick of the restrictions. Who isn't? But being sick of something doesn't give people the right to put other people at risk. Maybe you're right, and all this caution is for nothing. But is that really your decision to make in public spaces at this point in time, when the disease is showing a clear comeback in some parts of this country (based on hospitalizations and not just number of positive cases)? I would say no. I would say that's irresponsible. But obviously you're free to do what you want. Here's an article from Science Daily about the effectiveness of masks. I expect you think it's fake news, but for what it's worth: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0612172200.htm
Pam is offline  
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Pam For This Useful Post:
Billy Bob (06-18-2020), catdon (06-18-2020), chasedawg (06-17-2020), Jdarby (06-18-2020), luckypete (06-19-2020), Newbiesaukee (06-17-2020), rick35 (06-17-2020), Spider Girl (06-18-2020), winniplayhouse (06-17-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 12:38 PM   #2
garysanfran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco/Meredith
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 668
Thanked 682 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Usually proceeding on the side of caution is good advice...Why noy here?
__________________
Gary
~~~~_/) ~~~
~~~~~~~~
garysanfran is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to garysanfran For This Useful Post:
luckypete (06-19-2020), Pam (06-18-2020), Spider Girl (06-18-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 12:52 PM   #3
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,020 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysanfran View Post
Usually proceeding on the side of caution is good advice...Why noy here?
Not at the expense of our liberties and the economy. We have completely overreacted to this nonsense.
Major is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
Hillcountry (06-17-2020), jogator1 (06-17-2020), lakeporter65 (06-18-2020), Reilly (06-18-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 02:38 PM   #4
garysanfran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco/Meredith
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 668
Thanked 682 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
Not at the expense of our liberties and the economy. We have completely overreacted to this nonsense.
You, by choice, chose to be around others who, by choice, don't want to be around you, but have to because THEY HAVE NO CHOICE. And why is your rights more important than mine? I think your macho is dangerous to others...Major!
__________________
Gary
~~~~_/) ~~~
~~~~~~~~
garysanfran is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to garysanfran For This Useful Post:
ApS (06-17-2020), Billy Bob (06-18-2020), chasedawg (06-17-2020), Flylady (06-22-2020), Outdoorsman (06-17-2020), PENIVISA (06-17-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 02:56 PM   #5
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,020 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysanfran View Post
You, by choice, chose to be around others who, by choice, don't want to be around you, but have to because THEY HAVE NO CHOICE. And why is your rights more important than mine? I think your macho is dangerous to others...Major!
That's your opinion. You believe it's dangerous, I believe it's an overreaction and a farce. There is nothing macho about my behavior. I don't think it's dangerous in any way shape or form for a person under 65 with no underlying conditions. It is nearly statistically impossible to die from the dreaded Chinese coronavirus if you are under 70 and in relatively good health. The SCIENCE supports this view. (The average age of death is 82.) If you are old and/or have an underlying condition, then it is YOUR responsibility to protect yourself. Just as it has always been. Why is it so difficult to wrap our heads around the notion that there may have been a much, much better way to handle this so-called pandemic? Why is it so difficult to understand that perhaps, just perhaps we should have protected those who are the most vulnerable and allow those of us who work and run businesses to continue our daily lives? You make it sound that you come from a view of authority. I hate to tell you that you and no one knows what they are doing, even the so-called experts.
Major is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
Hillcountry (06-17-2020)
Sponsored Links
Old 06-17-2020, 02:59 PM   #6
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,420
Thanks: 1,677
Thanked 786 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
That's your opinion. You believe it's dangerous, I believe it's an overreaction and a farce. There is nothing macho about my behavior. I don't think it's dangerous in any way shape or form for a person under 65 with no underlying conditions. It is nearly statistically impossible to die from the dreaded Chinese coronavirus if you are under 70 and in relatively good health. The SCIENCE supports this view. (The average age of death is 82.) If you are old and/or have an underlying condition, then it is YOUR responsibility to protect yourself. Just as it has always been. Why is it so difficult to wrap our heads around the notion that there may have been a much, much better way to handle this so-called pandemic? Why is it so difficult to understand that perhaps, just perhaps we should have protected those who are the most vulnerable and allow those of us who work and run businesses to continue our daily lives? You make it sound that you come from a view of authority. I hate to tell you that you and no one knows what they are doing, even the so-called experts.
I am 70 and not compromised by underlying conditions...and I agree wholeheartedly.
Hillcountry is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post:
lakeporter65 (06-18-2020), Major (06-17-2020), Reilly (06-18-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 04:06 PM   #7
jbolty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 664
Thanks: 320
Thanked 252 Times in 151 Posts
Default

at the risk of further beating a dead horse...

Quote:
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” Fauci told CBS’s “60 Minutes” on March 8. “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences—people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”

Now we know why he told Americans not to wear masks — he was lying.

“Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N-95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply,” Fauci told The Street. “And we wanted to make sure that the people, namely the health care workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in a harm way, to take care of people who, you know, were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected,” had access to the masks.

The first paragraph explains why I contend the mask routine is pointless. Most people wear them wrong, touch them, touch their face, then their phone, then their wallet and key pad and everything else in sight and then back to their face to take the mask off again. All this aside from the size of a virus compared to the mesh of a paper mask or bandana. Because of all this I believe the virus has spread way more than any one realizes and it has not mattered much.
jbolty is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jbolty For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (06-17-2020), Major (06-17-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 06:22 PM   #8
exlakesregioner
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 45
Thanks: 2
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

because nowadays it's all about me, me me, and to hell with anyone else
exlakesregioner is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to exlakesregioner For This Useful Post:
TheRoBoat (06-17-2020)
Old 06-17-2020, 12:49 PM   #9
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,020 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam View Post
You are correct that a lot isn't known about this disease. The reason that the original recommendation was not to wear masks was two fold: masks were needed for healthcare workers, and originally, it was not known that the virus was spread through aerosol transmission. It's understandable that you're sick of the restrictions. Who isn't? But being sick of something doesn't give people the right to put other people at risk. Maybe you're right, and all this caution is for nothing. But is that really your decision to make in public spaces at this point in time, when the disease is showing a clear comeback in some parts of this country (based on hospitalizations and not just number of positive cases)? I would say no. I would say that's irresponsible. But obviously you're free to do what you want. Here's an article from Science Daily about the effectiveness of masks. I expect you think it's fake news, but for what it's worth: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0612172200.htm
We are making this up as we go. At first, we were told that we need to stay home to flatten the curve and not overwhelm healthcare workers. This was supposed to last two weeks. This has turned into a three-month nightmare where far more damage has been caused by destroying businesses and putting people out of work. It is now about control. There is no evidence that our actions have flattened the curve, prevented deaths, etc. In fact, it seems like we got things backwards. We forced healthy people to stay at home and exposed old and compromised people to the virus.

Unless it is a law, it is my decision to make whether to wear a mask, social distance, etc. I haven't worn a mask or social distanced. I've used common sense, and am doing just fine. When my mom came back from Florida, me and my family members have been careful around her since she is compromised. You seem to enjoy being treated like a child. I do not.

The government hacks and politicians making the decisions for us have NO stake in the matter. None of them to the best of my knowledge have missed a paycheck. Dr. Fraud's government organization (NIAID) is guaranteed funding for the next 20+ years. The biggest political whopper (other than "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" or "if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance") is that we are all in this together. My son, who has been furloughed since the beginning of this nonsense, has suffered far more than the government hacks and the politicians. Small business owners have suffered far more than government hacks and politicians. And for what?! A failed social experiment, which proves that the American people do not value liberty. I am disgusted by all this.
Major is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
DougNH (06-17-2020), Hillcountry (06-17-2020), jbolty (06-17-2020), jogator1 (06-17-2020), lakeporter65 (06-18-2020), mhtranger (06-20-2020), Reilly (06-18-2020)
Old 06-18-2020, 08:53 AM   #10
Jdarby
Senior Member
 
Jdarby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Long Island
Posts: 170
Thanks: 137
Thanked 106 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
We are making this up as we go. At first, we were told that we need to stay home to flatten the curve and not overwhelm healthcare workers. This was supposed to last two weeks. This has turned into a three-month nightmare where far more damage has been caused by destroying businesses and putting people out of work. It is now about control. There is no evidence that our actions have flattened the curve, prevented deaths, etc. In fact, it seems like we got things backwards. We forced healthy people to stay at home and exposed old and compromised people to the virus.

Unless it is a law, it is my decision to make whether to wear a mask, social distance, etc. I haven't worn a mask or social distanced. I've used common sense, and am doing just fine. When my mom came back from Florida, me and my family members have been careful around her since she is compromised. You seem to enjoy being treated like a child. I do not.

The government hacks and politicians making the decisions for us have NO stake in the matter. None of them to the best of my knowledge have missed a paycheck. Dr. Fraud's government organization (NIAID) is guaranteed funding for the next 20+ years. The biggest political whopper (other than "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" or "if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance") is that we are all in this together. My son, who has been furloughed since the beginning of this nonsense, has suffered far more than the government hacks and the politicians. Small business owners have suffered far more than government hacks and politicians. And for what?! A failed social experiment, which proves that the American people do not value liberty. I am disgusted by all this.
Staying at home lasting only two weeks was if quite literally everyone stayed home for 2 weeks. Shutting everything down and not leaving your home for 2 weeks. If everyone did that, it would have shut the spread down. Obviously that could never happen, at least not in this country. You are correct that this is being made up as we go because so little is known about this new virus.
Jdarby is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.17396 seconds