Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Covid-19 Discussions & Information
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2020, 05:58 AM   #1
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Red face Working from Recent Memory...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbonies View Post
Glendale - you are spot on with all your points. It's nice to see balance, which doesn't have much of a chance with the shrieking extremists on both sides.
Part of the incomprehension is in the numbers.

Pennsylvania's ME's forced their government health department to adjust their death-count numbers down by 1000.

New York raised theirs by 3700.

Factoid: If your state's governor is a Democrat, your chance of dying of C-19 is five times higher than otherwise.

Last edited by ApS; 04-28-2020 at 06:36 AM. Reason: Add factoid
ApS is offline  
Old 04-28-2020, 06:56 AM   #2
Not to Worry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 191
Thanks: 93
Thanked 84 Times in 55 Posts
Default Factoid

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
Part of the incomprehension is in the numbers.

Pennsylvania's ME's forced their government health department to adjust their death-count numbers down by 1000.

New York raised theirs by 3700.

Factoid: If your state's governor is a Democrat, your chance of dying of C-19 is five times higher than otherwise.
For example Massachusetts is testing and tracing therefore more cases are known than for example Florida. Testing finds more cases therefore more testing equals better or more accurate deaths from Covid-19. Your chance of dying are not YET dependent on a red or blue state. Georgia might change that but time will tell.
Not to Worry is offline  
Old 04-29-2020, 03:37 PM   #3
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Question The Deathcount Itself Hardly Needs Such Accuracy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Not to Worry View Post
For example Massachusetts is testing and tracing therefore more cases are known than for example Florida. Testing finds more cases therefore more testing equals better or more accurate deaths from Covid-19. Your chance of dying are not YET dependent on a red or blue state. Georgia might change that but time will tell.
Will Massachusetts' "testers" be as accurate as Massachusetts' state clinicians analyzing cocaine?


Massachusetts and Florida are both administered by Republican Governors.

Since last year's election for Georgia's Governor was barely conceded, Georgia may not be "in the count".

The contestant for Florida's top administrator was progressive Andrew Gillum, who's since made some devastating headlines:
https://nypost-com.cdn.ampproject.or...-gay-escort%2F
ApS is offline  
Old 04-28-2020, 06:58 AM   #4
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,020 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Firstly, the story about the dentist is true. It is obvious NTW doesn't know much about the Navy. Not all ships are assigned surgeons. Smaller ships, like destroyers, may have a dentist, a PA, or some other health professional who is not a doctor. These health professionals must deal with any and all emergencies when at sea. My friend had to reattach an arm of a seaman who severed his arm.

Secondly, I liken this to a bad flu because the raw numbers tell me so. To date, 56,803 Americans have died because of the Chinese coronavirus. (Although, I think this number is vastly inflated, since it includes patients in hospice, regular flu victims, and pretty much anyone in a nursing or retirement facility.) But let's take the number as is. For argument sake, let's say after the second wave that a total of 120,000 Americans will fall victim to the Chinese coronavirus. In 2017-2018, between 60,000 and 85,000 Americans died of the flu. I would say that 120,000 deaths is a bad year, perhaps even an historically bad year.

We adopted our course of action because the models were wrong and overhyped. The media and social media got caught up with "flattening the curve" although this approach had never been tried. There is no evidence as of now that quarantining and sheltering has done anything to protect us. Nearly all victims are old and/or have preexisting conditions. It seems to me that a better course would have been to protect those in nursing and retirement facilities, since the vast majority of victims are from there.
Major is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
jogator1 (04-30-2020), MRD (04-28-2020)
Old 04-28-2020, 08:35 AM   #5
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Question Numbers Over-Hyped?

Maybe yes? Maybe no?
Attached Images
 
ApS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 04-28-2020, 08:39 AM   #6
Glendale Deli Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 21
Thanks: 5
Thanked 35 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post

Secondly, I liken this to a bad flu because the raw numbers tell me so. To date, 56,803 Americans have died because of the Chinese coronavirus. (Although, I think this number is vastly inflated, since it includes patients in hospice, regular flu victims, and pretty much anyone in a nursing or retirement facility.) But let's take the number as is. For argument sake, let's say after the second wave that a total of 120,000 Americans will fall victim to the Chinese coronavirus. In 2017-2018, between 60,000 and 85,000 Americans died of the flu. I would say that 120,000 deaths is a bad year, perhaps even an historically bad year.

We adopted our course of action because the models were wrong and overhyped. The media and social media got caught up with "flattening the curve" although this approach had never been tried. There is no evidence as of now that quarantining and sheltering has done anything to protect us. Nearly all victims are old and/or have preexisting conditions. It seems to me that a better course would have been to protect those in nursing and retirement facilities, since the vast majority of victims are from there.
Interesting. Guess we won’t know the true story until the after analysis is done. This med professional author linked below thinks that now that nursing homes are required to report data that the death numbers will actually increase significantly.

https://theconversation.com/failure-...numbers-137212

It seems a real stretch to argue that quarantining and sheltering has done nothing to protect us. That seems highly illogical and is contrary to what expert virologists worldwide believe. But maybe because we started so late in the U.S. the horse had left the barn well before we took measures to protect, and those measures weren’t all that effective and that is why we have such a disproportionate share of worldwide deaths. Seems illogical but who knows. But it’s impossible to make a reasonable argument that quarantining and sheltering didn’t protect people in countries that moved early and aggressively. It very obviously made a huge difference compared to countries that were late on the start and/or not as aggressive.
Glendale Deli Boy is offline  
Old 04-28-2020, 08:53 AM   #7
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,020 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glendale Deli Boy View Post
Interesting. Guess we won’t know the true story until the after analysis is done. This med professional author linked below thinks that now that nursing homes are required to report data that the death numbers will actually increase significantly.

https://theconversation.com/failure-...numbers-137212

It seems a real stretch to argue that quarantining and sheltering has done nothing to protect us. That seems highly illogical and is contrary to what expert virologists worldwide believe. But maybe because we started so late in the U.S. the horse had left the barn well before we took measures to protect, and those measures weren’t all that effective and that is why we have such a disproportionate share of worldwide deaths. Seems illogical but who knows. But it’s impossible to make a reasonable argument that quarantining and sheltering didn’t protect people in countries that moved early and aggressively. It very obviously made a huge difference compared to countries that were late on the start and/or not as aggressive.
Remember these were the same so-called experts who in late February were telling us there is nothing to worry about. These are the same experts that told us not to wear masks or gloves. These are the same experts who told us limiting travel from China was unnecessary. They really don't know what they are doing. They are making it up as they go along. It wasn't until the media and social media caused a frenzy that they changed their tune.

I believe the financial and economic harm caused by this overreaction will be far worse. I guess we'll find out.
Major is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
ApS (04-28-2020), Seaplane Pilot (04-28-2020)
Old 04-28-2020, 09:11 AM   #8
Glendale Deli Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 21
Thanks: 5
Thanked 35 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
Remember these were the same so-called experts who in late February were telling us there is nothing to worry about. These are the same experts that told us not to wear masks or gloves. These are the same experts who told us limiting travel from China was unnecessary. They really don't know what they are doing. They are making it up as they go along. It wasn't until the media and social media caused a frenzy that they changed their tune.

I believe the financial and economic harm caused by this overreaction will be far worse. I guess we'll find out.
No, those aren’t the virologists that I am referring to. Anyway, I didn’t jump in here to just rehash ground that’s been covered repeatedly so I will step back out now and do something more productive than gum up this message board. Stay safe all and may we all enjoy another beautiful summer at the Lake. Hoping for the best.
Glendale Deli Boy is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Glendale Deli Boy For This Useful Post:
ebko87 (04-28-2020), gillygirl (04-28-2020)
Old 04-28-2020, 05:59 PM   #9
Wifi-1
Senior Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 213
Thanks: 196
Thanked 87 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Wifi-1 is offline  
Old 04-28-2020, 07:46 PM   #10
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 522
Thanks: 512
Thanked 314 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glendale Deli Boy View Post
Interesting. Guess we won’t know the true story until the after analysis is done. This med professional author linked below thinks that now that nursing homes are required to report data that the death numbers will actually increase significantly.

https://theconversation.com/failure-...numbers-137212

It seems a real stretch to argue that quarantining and sheltering has done nothing to protect us. That seems highly illogical and is contrary to what expert virologists worldwide believe. But maybe because we started so late in the U.S. the horse had left the barn well before we took measures to protect, and those measures weren’t all that effective and that is why we have such a disproportionate share of worldwide deaths. Seems illogical but who knows. But it’s impossible to make a reasonable argument that quarantining and sheltering didn’t protect people in countries that moved early and aggressively. It very obviously made a huge difference compared to countries that were late on the start and/or not as aggressive.

Thank you...check my post today that is titled "did you see this..." Check out the explosive live graph that shows on 2/24 US was at the bottom of all the world countries having the number of cases. Within 4 weeks we surpassed every country of cases. Then 6 weeks US had 40% of the world cases. What does that tell you? how could this have happened? This is not a seasonal 6 month flu by an means.
chasedawg is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.32183 seconds