![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 273
Thanks: 119
Thanked 62 Times in 40 Posts
|
I just gave this a quick read and need to print it out for a more thorough appraisal, but I found #14 a bit disturbing.
Please note what is in brackets is a strike through on the original proposed text, meaning it's a change. . My tablet can't handle the strike-through. The potential could be scary. Also, I think I read that the fees paid for culvert cleaning and repair will go up how does that help water quality ?14 Aquatic Resources Fund. Amend RSA 482-A:29, II to read as follows: II. A separate, non-lapsing account shall be established within the fund into which all administrative assessments collected under RSA 482-A:30, III and RSA 482-A:30-a, II shall be placed. Such account moneys shall [only] be used [to support up to 2 full-time positions] for administration of the fund, including staff, and related projects. [No other fund moneys shall be used for state personnel costs.] I'm glad we did the new dock last year! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,028
Thanks: 2,284
Thanked 789 Times in 564 Posts
|
Why am I reminded of Maryland's "Rain Tax"?
![]() Quote:
![]() >
__________________
Is it "Common Sense" isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|