Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Home, Cottage or Land Maintenance
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2017, 04:25 PM   #1
DesertDweller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV and Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 381
Thanks: 25
Thanked 87 Times in 73 Posts
Default

I personally would never have a non composite deck again and my guess is that it would be a very good selling point for a house. Never need to stain, treat, or otherwise and continues to look great. My deck is gray in color with white railings and I think it looks really nice. Sure it scuffs and what not but nothing to get too excited about. Trex is the original and many would say the best. There are cheaper alternatives. One thing to note is that depending on what brand/type of composite decking you go with, make sure your existing joists are not too far apart to properly support the composite lumber. I think Trex comes in different qualities like you mentioned and some of them are designed to span longer joist spacing distances.
DesertDweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 06:04 PM   #2
Merrymeeting
Senior Member
 
Merrymeeting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,226
Thanks: 302
Thanked 800 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertDweller View Post
I personally would never have a non composite deck again and my guess is that it would be a very good selling point for a house.
What he said. Every deck we've done for the past 10 years has been some type of man-made material and I've never regretted it.

When we re-built our cabin at the lake, one of my priorities was to design everything outside to be as maintenance free as possible. Was it more expensive? Somewhat. But worth it. 5 years later, outside looks as good as when it was built, and we've yet to do anything to it. Most people don't even know it's not wood until they ask.
Merrymeeting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 06:58 PM   #3
jetlag100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Revere, Massachusetts and Moultonborough, N.H.
Posts: 311
Thanks: 228
Thanked 79 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Used composite up the lake house...it gets dumped on every time the metal roof lets go...LOL ..One year the roof had ice, it slid, it broke through the deck...that was an unusually hard winter...looks great...it's 10 years old... cleans up beautifully...use deck wash on it..no issues...wish I had it at my city house..$$$$$$$$$$$
jetlag100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 07:12 PM   #4
winni83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 430
Thanks: 17
Thanked 213 Times in 135 Posts
Default

When we built our house 4 years ago we used Azek for the decks. Very pleased with the way they look. We do use a snow shovel with a plastic blade on the decks.
winni83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 07:24 PM   #5
DickR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 751
Thanks: 4
Thanked 259 Times in 171 Posts
Default

On our new house, built 2010-11, we used Fiberon imitation IPE composite decking. It still looks new, and it's a good match to the house siding. It has a fairly tough shell over the core material and seems to stand up well to abuse, including snow shoveling with a plastic shovel. I suspect PT would suffer more abuse over time than the composite does, being a wood product. Plus, the PT would tend to present potential splinters to bare feet over time, whereas the composite will not. Long-term maintenance tilts in favor of composite. Bear in mind that labor to install either type of decking likely will be more than the material itself, so a lesser uptick for better material won't be as big a deal.

If you do go composite, as others have noted, make sure the joist spacing is close enough for the material, particularly if the decking is attached at 45 degrees, which may call for 12" OC joist spacing. Also, if composite decking is used, and it has grooves on the edges for the use of hidden fasteners, then lateral bracing of the framing will be required, since the use of those fasteners does not provide racking resistance.
DickR is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-22-2017, 07:51 PM   #6
Slickcraft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and The Taylor Community
Posts: 3,310
Thanks: 1,227
Thanked 2,098 Times in 957 Posts
Default

Thanks for all of the good replies and I suspect some more yet to come.

Right now we are sticking with the composite plan, likely a light grey color. That is the color of the stain we have on the old PT decking and have been happy with that color. The bid that we have is the Trex Transcend line, will talk to the contractor about other options. The size of the deck does lead to pretty high material costs.

The 25 year old PT decking would have been in much better shape if the original owner had sealed or stained it. Rather it went 10 years untouched except for mother nature resulting in lots of surface cracks and splinters.

As an aside I must have messed up on my advanced search prior to posting. Got zero past results meaning that I must have accidentally clicked on the wrong forum on the sidebar.
Slickcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 08:02 PM   #7
Woody38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 578
Thanks: 46
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts
Post

Our house in Massachusetts is 25 years old with the original pine decking. The original owner had the house built and the contractor did the usual by cutting corners. The deck is stained and had minimal care by the owner. Interesting that we painted the house two years ago and I assumed the deck was included. When they finished I was told they would stain the deck for $800.
My fault, but this is the first time I had a house painted and they did not do the deck. This deck is sort of beat up but presentable. I got out the sander and did some sanding on the worst spots and lightly elsewhere. My real issue is that stain today is not oil. Didn't soak in so good and did not shed water like the oil. I am applying a second coat.
If I were to replace this deck I would use mahogany or teak. AND proper maintainance
Woody38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 09:15 PM   #8
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tuftonboro
Posts: 1,232
Thanks: 190
Thanked 323 Times in 236 Posts
Default

What Ishoot said. Two of my friends are quality builders and will use nothing but azek. To manyissues with trex that they have to go back and fix.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SAB1 For This Useful Post:
SteveO123 (02-24-2017)
Old 02-23-2017, 12:31 PM   #9
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,591
Thanks: 1,628
Thanked 1,641 Times in 844 Posts
Default Azek

We just replaced our Douglas Fir deck with Azek. We bought it at Winnipesaukee Lumber- they were great to deal with.

Our joists were already 12"OC. We did picture frame ours to cover the edges.
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VitaBene For This Useful Post:
tis (02-23-2017)
Old 02-23-2017, 02:08 PM   #10
Busy Livin'
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melody Island
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Hidden Fasteners

Recommend the Camo Hidden Fastener System for whatever decking material you use. We did our deck last year with Azek from Winni Lumber and secured it with the Camo system...came out great. Easy to use and practically invisible.
Busy Livin' is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Busy Livin' For This Useful Post:
Slickcraft (02-24-2017), tis (02-23-2017)
Old 02-23-2017, 02:55 PM   #11
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

When I had put new siding on my house I used Azek for all the trim, facia and crown molding on my windows. Love that stuff. Azek came more recommended than Trex. FWIW

Just an fyi. I have seen on both materials what appears like mold spots. It does come off with scrubbing.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:14 PM   #12
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 1,329
Thanked 559 Times in 288 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR View Post
When I had put new siding on my house I used Azek for all the trim, facia and crown molding on my windows. Love that stuff. Azek came more recommended than Trex. FWIW

Just an fyi. I have seen on both materials what appears like mold spots. It does come off with scrubbing.
The composite decking does get dirty on occasion. The solution is easy.......just use a power washer and everything looks brand new. I spend 2-3 hours with a power washer on my composite deck and it looks like New after I'm finished. Definitely go with good quality composite.....you will not be disappointed.
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 01:29 PM   #13
CaptT820
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 122
Thanks: 86
Thanked 46 Times in 27 Posts
Default Composite

Couldn't agree with Easy Livin' any more. The Camo deck system is wayyy cheaper than hidden fasteners and goes in much faster. I built a 1350 sq. ft. full wrap around farmers porch on our last house using Camo and Evergrain decking by Tamko. The decking worked great and the system to put it in worked great. I cannot stress enough, as others have, that the joist spacing is absolutely critical depending on the product. I currently have mahogany at our house and I would replace it (if it wasn't so expensive) with composite.
CaptT820 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 05:39 PM   #14
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,582
Thanks: 3,224
Thanked 1,106 Times in 796 Posts
Default Fiberon

Probably the oldest and preferred by top builders and architects.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 04:40 PM   #15
Diver Vince
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bonaire Dutch Caribbean and Gilford NH
Posts: 103
Thanks: 31
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Let's make this simple..Use Azek. Can't be beat. Our deck now 4 years old and looks great!
Diver Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Diver Vince For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (03-24-2017)
Old 06-30-2017, 06:34 AM   #16
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Red face PT=Stronger, Cheaper, Check for Splinters...

We've got a PT dock that's 37 years old.

After casual and intermittent treatments with Thompson's Sealer, it's only recently that some deterioration has appeared. I'm dabbing the trouble spots with an epoxy w/filler, rather than taking the trouble to replace a few boards.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diver Vince View Post
Let's make this simple..Use Azek. Can't be beat. Our deck now 4 years old and looks great!
Azek showed no complaints on Complaintsboard. Other brands didn't fare so well...

.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 08:40 PM   #17
Leoskeys
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 148
Thanks: 131
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Default Azek decking - slippery when wet?

We are having our lakefront deck redone, and are planning on Azek. We have dozens of samples in hand. Looks to be three options/levels of Azek - Vintage(most expensive), Arbor, and Harvest(least expensive). Does anyone have experience with this type of decking when wet? Any specific opinions on the three options?. The most expensive seems to have the best “grain” and traction. We may also use the same to redo our docks decking. Obviouslly Azek comes well recommended by this forum, but is it much more slippery than pressure treated, and anyone have personal experience with the three levels and the look, feel.
Leoskeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 10:02 PM   #18
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,284
Thanks: 2,402
Thanked 5,291 Times in 2,062 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leoskeys View Post
We are having our lakefront deck redone, and are planning on Azek. We have dozens of samples in hand. Looks to be three options/levels of Azek - Vintage(most expensive), Arbor, and Harvest(least expensive). Does anyone have experience with this type of decking when wet? Any specific opinions on the three options?. The most expensive seems to have the best “grain” and traction. We may also use the same to redo our docks decking. Obviouslly Azek comes well recommended by this forum, but is it much more slippery than pressure treated, and anyone have personal experience with the three levels and the look, feel.
You won’t go wrong with Azek decking. It’s been around for a long time and is a proven excellent product. I have Azek at my home in Gilford and do not find it any more slippery than wood.

I am not positive but believe their more expensive Vintage line of decking is also a fire rated product. Depending on your use and budget the fire rating may be well worth the difference in price.

Darker colors will absorb heat more than lighter colors and will also show more fade. Fading will stop after one season in the sun.

Edited to add: just found this on line. Impressive! https://azek.com/docs/default-docume...index_v8-final

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 08:37 AM   #19
MeredithMan
Senior Member
 
MeredithMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bedford, NH; Meredith, NH
Posts: 955
Thanks: 263
Thanked 814 Times in 333 Posts
Default Azek...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leoskeys View Post
We are having our lakefront deck redone, and are planning on Azek. We have dozens of samples in hand. Looks to be three options/levels of Azek - Vintage(most expensive), Arbor, and Harvest(least expensive). Does anyone have experience with this type of decking when wet? Any specific opinions on the three options?. The most expensive seems to have the best “grain” and traction. We may also use the same to redo our docks decking. Obviouslly Azek comes well recommended by this forum, but is it much more slippery than pressure treated, and anyone have personal experience with the three levels and the look, feel.
We have Azek on our dock. It obviously gets very wet from waves, water from swimmers, etc. Unlike the Bon Jovi album, it is not slippery when wet, (anyone else from the 80's will get that one! ). The "planks" do have wood grain "texture" in them so that helps with the grip. Also, our dock is in direct sun all day and we've never found the decking to be very hot. It is a light gray in color, so that may be a factor.
MeredithMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.68733 seconds