Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Restaurant Information & Reviews
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2013, 11:48 AM   #1
P-3 Guy
Senior Member
 
P-3 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 509
Thanks: 4
Thanked 213 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cillovely View Post
FICA tax went from 4.2% to 6.2% And with that tax it also hurts employers since they have to match that tax and pay Uncle Sam for our phantom SS benefits that will maybe be there when we retire.
The FICA rate had previously been 6.2%; the reduction to 4.2% was a temporary measure. Anyone who was informed about the matter knew that it was scheduled to revert to the 6.2% rate at the beginning of this year.

Whether or not future SS benefits are "phantom" or not is a matter of debate, but I can tell you one thing for sure: the less money that is paid into SS (i.e. the FICA tax that employees and employers pay), the less chance there is that you'll get the benefits that you think you're entitled to. Wanting to pay less money and get the same benefits is not a sustainable financial strategy, folks.

Edited to add: this article from Forbes does a really good job of explaining it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonyn...-tax-increase/
P-3 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 09:02 AM   #2
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 349
Thanked 1,708 Times in 602 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMI Guy View Post
The FICA rate had previously been 6.2%; the reduction to 4.2% was a temporary measure. Anyone who was informed about the matter knew that it was scheduled to revert to the 6.2% rate at the beginning of this year.

Whether or not future SS benefits are "phantom" or not is a matter of debate, but I can tell you one thing for sure: the less money that is paid into SS (i.e. the FICA tax that employees and employers pay), the less chance there is that you'll get the benefits that you think you're entitled to. Wanting to pay less money and get the same benefits is not a sustainable financial strategy, folks.

Edited to add: this article from Forbes does a really good job of explaining it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonyn...-tax-increase/
Sounds like a cheerleader for higher taxes.....just a reminder,SS is not a benefit that we "think" we're entitled to.It is OUR money....contributed over a lifetime of working........this is why we don't have a political thread on the forum.
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post:
AKADQ (02-14-2013)
Old 02-14-2013, 09:20 AM   #3
P-3 Guy
Senior Member
 
P-3 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 509
Thanks: 4
Thanked 213 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
Sounds like a cheerleader for higher taxes.....just a reminder,SS is not a benefit that we "think" we're entitled to.It is OUR money....contributed over a lifetime of working........this is why we don't have a political thread on the forum.
No, not a cheerleader for higher taxes, just explaining the facts, which so often get lost in discussions like this.

And yes, as a contributory retirement system, anyone who pays into SS is entitled to benefits. The question is, HOW MUCH? Because as the system is currently set up, on average the benefits obtained exceed the contributions made. How much more than YOU contributed over your working life are YOU entitled to once you start collecting benefits?
P-3 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.08152 seconds