Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2014, 09:07 AM   #1
mcdude
Senior Member
 
mcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rock Haven Lake - West Newfield, ME
Posts: 5,359
Thanks: 374
Thanked 1,041 Times in 489 Posts
Default Governor's Island Lawsuit

from the Laconia Daily Sun
Quote:
Laconia man appealing court's order to pay legal fees of Governors Island Assoc. Thursday, 03 April 2014 02:02

LACONIA — A city resident whose property is included by deed in the Governors Island Association is appealing the court's decision to award legal fees to the club after a prolonged dispute about what he could do with his property.
Belknap County Superior Court Judge James O'Neill awarded the association $45,713 and earlier this week ordered an $50,000 attachment on any property Richard Homsi owns in the state.
The war between Homsi and the Governors Island Association began in 2012 when Homsi decided to add a cottage to the top of a garage he wanted to build on his property, which is located just on the Laconia side of the bridge that leads to the island, which is in Gilford.
Although the garage and cottage were allowable under Laconia's zoning ordinances, the unattached structure was not allowed according to the deed restrictions and covenants associated with belonging to the Governors Island Association.
The decision to include the property in the GIA was made by a previous owner but, typically in law, deed restrictions trump zoning ordinances.
Unable to present the governing board of the GIA an acceptable plan for a garage and a cottage, the GIA took him to court, initially getting a cease and desist order on the construction and later an order to tear down what he had already built.
The final judgment also granted $45,713 in legal fees to the association.
Homsi has appealed the decision to award legal fees to the N.H. Supreme Court, asking the court to decide whether or not the trial court committed a reversible error by finding the petitioned had no duty to mitigate its damages that led to the legal fees and whether or not the trial court had an obligation to inform Homsi that even though he belongs to the GIA he was still subjected to paying the legal fees incurred by his actions and the subsequent suit they filed against him.
__________________

mcdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2014, 12:26 PM   #2
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

..."asking the court to decide whether or not the trial court committed a reversible error by finding the petitioned had no duty to mitigate its damages that led to the legal fees"

Sorry I'm no lawyer so what the heck does that mean? Homsi won the suit filed against him by the GIA?
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2014, 01:16 PM   #3
IslandRadio
Senior Member
 
IslandRadio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mirror Lake - Full time resident
Posts: 398
Thanks: 70
Thanked 156 Times in 61 Posts
Default

The article says Homsi lost... and the court ordered him to demolish what was already built.
IslandRadio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2014, 01:44 PM   #4
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,504
Thanks: 3,113
Thanked 1,089 Times in 783 Posts
Default All Hornsi has to do.

is run for state legislature, win and you can do what you damn well please. Just ask my neighbor!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
RailroadJoe (04-03-2014)
Old 04-03-2014, 07:38 PM   #5
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,544
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,393
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
Default Sounds like a good topic for an afternoon of rafting..

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
is run for state legislature, win and you can do what you damn well please. Just ask my neighbor!
Love to hear the story, but I understand not putting in the forum.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-25-2023, 08:27 AM   #6
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,147 Times in 894 Posts
Default Long Court Case

And so it continues. The case started in court in 2012 and continues on. The subject property is the first one on the mainland side just north of the Governor's Island bridge.

To me, it seems that the Governor's Island Club should have nothing to do with a property that is not on the island, but the way it is set up that is not the case.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...76bf8b9a9.html
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2023, 10:28 AM   #7
barefootbay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 365
Thanks: 65
Thanked 88 Times in 63 Posts
Default

The law firms involved in this lengthy saga must be doing well !
barefootbay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2023, 03:01 PM   #8
Mr. V
Senior Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 61
Thanked 234 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barefootbay View Post
The law firms involved in this lengthy saga must be doing well !
The attorneys for appellant might have reason to be nervous: one basis for appeal is him seeming to believe that the trial court had a duty to tell him he'd have to pay attorney fees if he lost.

Duh...really?

This is the sort of thing his own attorney should have told him, it is not the purview of the court to give a litigant legal advice.

Possible malpractice if he was never informed of this potential liability by his attorney?
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe
Mr. V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2023, 06:51 PM   #9
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,904
Thanks: 2
Thanked 523 Times in 431 Posts
Default

Is the defendant acting as his own lawyer?
The article lists the GIC (?) lawyer. And I am guessing that the reimbursed legal fees are all going to his firm. So the longer it goes on the more they make should they prevail.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2023, 10:01 AM   #10
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,937
Thanks: 532
Thanked 568 Times in 334 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltonBB View Post
And so it continues. The case started in court in 2012 and continues on. The subject property is the first one on the mainland side just north of the Governor's Island bridge.

To me, it seems that the Governor's Island Club should have nothing to do with a property that is not on the island, but the way it is set up that is not the case.
The issue seems to be that a previous owner opted into the GIA, and the related deed restrictions associated with it.


Now that the property is a part of the GIA, they are legally obligated to hold the property to the deed restrictions outlined. Failure to do so creates an opening for other GIA residents to claim precedent for the association not upholding their bylaws and declarations, thus allowing them to ignore building restrictions and construct whatever they like. I am pretty sure this is the last thing that the GIA would want to deal with, as it would just create an utter free for all on the island.


I don't know any of the parties involved, or any of the history of this, but for the most part the GIA is likely acting out of a requirement here, not just some kind of petty HOA drama.


This is just based on my personal experience running a rather large HOA in Florida with a lot of residents that I refer to as "rich assholes" (but in a nice way). A tenure that is happily coming to an end soon
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2023, 02:06 PM   #11
Taz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Is the defendant acting as his own lawyer?
The article lists the GIC (?) lawyer. And I am guessing that the reimbursed legal fees are all going to his firm. So the longer it goes on the more they make should they prevail.
He is not represented. Defendant Homsi is representing himself.
Taz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2023, 02:10 PM   #12
Taz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. V View Post
The attorneys for appellant might have reason to be nervous: one basis for appeal is him seeming to believe that the trial court had a duty to tell him he'd have to pay attorney fees if he lost.

Duh...really?

This is the sort of thing his own attorney should have told him, it is not the purview of the court to give a litigant legal advice.

Possible malpractice if he was never informed of this potential liability by his attorney?
He is representing himself.
Taz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2023, 06:19 PM   #13
Mr. V
Senior Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 61
Thanked 234 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz View Post
He is representing himself.
LOL, well I guess that explains it.

You know what they say about people who represent themselves in court...
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe
Mr. V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2023, 10:13 AM   #14
LIforrelaxin
Senior Member
 
LIforrelaxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,813
Thanks: 1,011
Thanked 878 Times in 513 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
The issue seems to be that a previous owner opted into the GIA, and the related deed restrictions associated with it.

.......


I don't know any of the parties involved, or any of the history of this, but for the most part the GIA is likely acting out of a requirement here, not just some kind of petty HOA drama.

.........
All something like this is, is HOA drama.... The Answer is really quite simple, a previous owner opted into the HOA...... The HOA can opt to kick the current owner out of the HOA..... While I know it is not that simple.... this is all 1% problems....
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island.....
LIforrelaxin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2023, 03:50 PM   #15
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,147 Times in 894 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin View Post
All something like this is, is HOA drama.... The Answer is really quite simple, a previous owner opted into the HOA...... The HOA can opt to kick the current owner out of the HOA..... While I know it is not that simple.... this is all 1% problems....
You cannot just opt out or Homsi would have done so and avoided all of these problems. He has no desire to be in the "Club" would drop that membership in a heartbeat.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2023, 03:17 PM   #16
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 529
Thanks: 75
Thanked 197 Times in 130 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin View Post
All something like this is, is HOA drama.... The Answer is really quite simple, a previous owner opted into the HOA...... The HOA can opt to kick the current owner out of the HOA..... While I know it is not that simple.... this is all 1% problems....


Why does it matter if it’s a so-termed “1% problem”?


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2023, 06:25 PM   #17
trackeer
Member
 
trackeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashua/Laconia NH
Posts: 40
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I think Govenors Island are well represented by the 1% crowd, if you aren't one don't worry most of us aren't, that's why it's 1%
trackeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.25437 seconds