|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-27-2013, 04:37 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,893
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 765 Times in 548 Posts
|
Poker Run PFD Use
I don't know if participants are required to wear PFDs at those speeds; however, when I found a brand-new PFD floating in The Broads, I adopted it.
Distressing at the time—even though new—is that it weighed about twelve pounds due to water absorption. Later, I dismantled my old PFD to see what constituted "flotation", and it's the same stuff that you could rip in half with your bare hands. • Note that these off-the-shelf PFDs are not rated for a Poker Run's maximum speeds—nor for impact. Pics: |
07-29-2013, 03:02 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,539
Thanks: 1,577
Thanked 1,610 Times in 824 Posts
|
Quote:
|
07-29-2013, 04:36 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central MA
Posts: 77
Thanks: 23
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
So... I wonder what it does say?
|
07-29-2013, 04:38 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
|
Quote:
Edit: are you asking what the actually test is? no clue |
|
07-30-2013, 07:33 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,532
Thanks: 749
Thanked 346 Times in 259 Posts
|
I agree with HellRazor
I think it that it is stating it will not protect your body from impact like a bullet proof vest or falling and hitting the ground, as it is not made to do anything else but keep you a float, but if you hit the water over 50mph there is a good chance it could break apart and not do its job my guess is someone probably sued a manufacturer back in the day because it is called a life vest and it did not save a life and it did not involve staying a float
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
Sponsored Links |
|
08-03-2013, 06:12 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,893
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 765 Times in 548 Posts
|
Too Little Safety for Too Much HP...
Quote:
Actually, for this event, it's the non-rating for impact that matters. At SOTW Poker Run, five who were ejected lost everything they were wearing—including their PFDs. None survived. |
|
08-03-2013, 10:07 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,980
Thanks: 246
Thanked 739 Times in 440 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2013, 03:44 AM | #8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,893
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 765 Times in 548 Posts
|
(Photo now "scrubbed")
Quote:
Quote:
The first photo to come out from this event shows a boatload of passengers, with nobody wearing a PFD. |
||
08-07-2013, 06:11 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,980
Thanks: 246
Thanked 739 Times in 440 Posts
|
You mean like 99+% of adult lake boaters everywhere? Does not seem shocking to me. I have worn mine once while operating my boat on Winnipesuakee in the last 4 years and I'm not what you'd call daring (I always wear my seat belt and you should see the amount of gear I wear for a motorcycle ride).
|
08-07-2013, 07:42 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
|
Is there a law, rule or regulation that requires it?
__________________
Getting ready for winter! |
08-07-2013, 08:33 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
There is no law or regulation requiring the use of a PFD on a poker run. There are rules (APBA / OSS) that require the use of helmets and PFD's for racing.
Personally.. I am tired of people like APS who think there should be a regulation for everything... When is doubt regulate it out! It gets so old! Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
chipj29 (08-08-2013), Dave R (08-07-2013), Grandpa Redneck (08-07-2013), LIforrelaxin (08-07-2013), Webbsatwinni (08-07-2013) |
08-07-2013, 08:40 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
People carry PFDs on their boat to protect themselves from drowning, when their boat sinks.
On a boat your only protection from a collision is using your brain to avoid one. Only a fool would expect a $5 piece of floatation foam to protect them from a collision. |
08-07-2013, 11:59 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 283
Thanks: 1
Thanked 66 Times in 38 Posts
|
No jacket is Impact rated anymore....
Long official explanation form PFDMA.com......
Inherently buoyant PFDs have information on the label that states “strength tested at XXX MPH.” The minimum speed for any approval is 35 MPH, but manufacturers can choose to have their product tested at 50, 75 or 100 MPH. If the manufacturer wants to label the product for use as a lifejacket for PWC, waterskiing or similar towed uses, the devise must be tested at a minimum of 50 MPH. The device is tested by attaching it to a metal frame dropped in various positions into the water from a boat or helicopter. To pass the dynamic strength test, the device cannot show any signs of mechanical damage -- such as tears, rips, loose seams, or broken or distorted hardware -- sufficient to affect its performance. This test IS NOT an evaluation of what sort of protection the device might give the wearer in falls at those speeds. This is a common misunderstanding. The test is only intended to evaluate the integrity of the materials and construction. In fact, the label also says, ”NOT TESTED FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION FROM IMPACT.” PFD manufacturers and retailers are not allowed to use any marketing information that implies impact protection. As an example, manufacturers can not use “100 MPH “ as part of their product markings or name, nor can they use words like “impact” which might imply impact protection. To qualify for PWC, waterskiing or similar towed uses, a lifejacket must be dynamic strength tested (also called strength tested) at 50 MPH or greater, as already noted. In addition, these vests must have three front closures, two of which must be body encircling. An example would be a front zipper and two body encircling belts, or two body encircling belts and a chest strap. This type of closure system would provide for a more secure fit in case of a fall. When a PFD design does not meet the requirements of strength testing and approved closure system for a waterski device, the label must state: “Not Approved for personal watercraft, waterskiing or similar towed uses.” The goal is to have people wear vests that will not come off or tear apart in a fall. This information is now in the text of the label and the user needs to read the label carefully when choosing a PFD for waterskiing. However, the inclusion of this statement was introduced in 2003, so it is possible to have two identical lifejackets -- one with the statement and one without -- determined by when they were made. The message to the user should be to read the PFD label of any lifejacket to see if it has any exclusions for their intended use. It is equally important to ensure the lifejacket is of the proper size so it will not come off in a fall. As a final note, remember that no inflatable is approved for PWC, watersking or similar towed use. . |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 4Fun For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (08-08-2013), BroadHopper (08-07-2013), Dave R (08-07-2013), jrc (08-07-2013), LIforrelaxin (08-07-2013) |
08-07-2013, 02:39 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,162
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
|
Quote:
He was fine in the beginning of the season. I can't wait until he move back to Florida and starting muddling into their affairs.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post: | ||
Webbsatwinni (08-07-2013) |
08-07-2013, 02:50 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,162
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
|
PFD protection
is just that, for flotation. When I started water ski racing, I had to learn to tuck into a ball by folding my arms around my legs and tuck my head between my knees. When I fall in this position, I actually roll into the water. This is the only way you can survive a high speed fall into the water. APBA, OSSA and SI also suggests the same strategy. I was told by a Navy Seal that this is also the case in their training. A PFD only aid in flotation.
In any boat travelling at high speed a kill switch attached to the body is also a great idea. This will eliminate a runaway boat, such as you have heard in the news recently. I notice almost all performance boats have a lanyard switch and it is there for a purpose. Not all boaters used them and frankly I know of one newbie that does not even know what it is! A boat is only as good as the skipper. Regulations do not make the skipper. The skipper do!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
08-09-2013, 09:56 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,539
Thanks: 1,577
Thanked 1,610 Times in 824 Posts
|
|
08-11-2013, 04:34 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,893
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 765 Times in 548 Posts
|
What Was the Question?
In every speed event, I wear—or carry onboard—every possible safety option; however, I sign a waiver not to hold the event organizers liable for damages from misadventure.
• As we saw at this forum, VB posted circumstances of speedboats' swamping in a zone officially designated for "no-wake". • Combined with videos and/or witness testimony of exceeding that speed—or exceeding any other limit on speed—the organizers and participants would be liable for damages in New Hampshire's Civil Court. • During an infamous Lake Winnipesaukee fatality case in New Hampshire's Civil Court, we've observed that insurance companies aren't always required to pay out damages. |
08-11-2013, 09:12 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loon Mtn. winters...Meredith Neck summers
Posts: 398
Thanks: 288
Thanked 94 Times in 60 Posts
|
VB, NO, APS DOES NOT wear a life-jacket. THAT was the answer to the question.
|
08-12-2013, 07:56 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
|
You would have a tough time finding the organizers liable. Each individual is responsible for their actions.
__________________
Getting ready for winter! |
08-12-2013, 09:30 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,162
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
|
Money and Power
If one has money and power any case can be sued and won.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
Bookmarks |
|
|