![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Isola Gatto Nero
Posts: 697
Thanks: 162
Thanked 263 Times in 81 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
La vita è buona su Isola Gatto Nero |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 67
Thanked 172 Times in 128 Posts
|
Steveo,
I believe NH has a "Zero Tolerance" for gray water discharge on land or in the water so technically that person is probably breaking a law there. Even though there are much greater 'discharge' violations taking place at every beach it is still kind of rude. I know if I saw somebody doing that I would say "Eew yuck!" If you're really squeamish, dont drink city water in Laconia! ![]() As for the mooring itself, I am pretty sure only the land owner can file the application but can authorise anyone else to use it. A tenant usually has the same rights as a landowner but the clerk might ask to see the lease. I wouldnt want to bet a large sum on how that might turn out, either way. Especially for a seasonal or short-term rental. As for the "slamming" that sometimes goes on, It can get a bit "rough and tumble" on the internet. Due the anonymity sometimes people feel less accountable for their words. I have a fairly thick skin myself and try to interpret how folks post with the benefit of the doubt. Most folks here will apologise or back-peddle a bit if you suggest they seem a bit over the edge. Hang in there! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 1,766
Thanks: 32
Thanked 441 Times in 207 Posts
|
I just took a look at my Mooring Permit, at the bottom is says...
Pursuant to RSA 270:63, this permit may not be transfered to any other person or location by gift, sale, lease or rent, and may be revoked with just cause, as specified in Saf-C 408.09. To get the stickers every year you must send them a copy of the registration of the boat that will be using the mooring. Plus $25 per mooring. I don't know if spitting toothpaste into the lake is legal or not (where is Skip when we need him). My question is... if her spit goes in the lake... what is she doing with her urine? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
|
Quote:
Anyway, a couple of quick points: As BI has pointed out, you cannot lease or sell your mooring permit to a third party. You can allow a guest to stay on your mooring...but if it's an overnight junket on a houseboat YOU MUST notify the Department of Environmental Services. This is the Agency that you would take your complaint to in reference to the activity noted above. Don't you just love New Hampshire law? And frankly, what difference does it make if you spend 8 to 10 hours on the water at night, or do so during the day? Where do we think all the daytrippers without heads are doing their stuff? I have a lot of respect for the LT, but did get a good chuckle out of his e-mail. Some of you good folks are starting to catch on to how convoluted the law making process is in this State. The strange twists and turns that HB847 took are but a good example. Let's talk frankly about the overnight anchor/mooring law. This law was implemented several decades ago when the Lake was much less congested and times a little simpler. It had a specific purpose, to prevent people from launching and living on the inland waters in toilet/bed equipped houseboats unregulated, a problem that was slowly creeping across the country. The law specifically targeted legally defined "houseboats". In the early 90s it was clearly recognized by the State that the verbiage did not include all watercraft, but a specific and narrowly defined class. It 1993 the Senate, recognizing the loophole, attempted to ammend the law to include all watercraft. After leaving the Senate the bill was ITL'd, and the subject quietly dropped. Fast forward a decade or so, and now you have a much more crowded lake with much larger boats, easier to spend the night on. But here's the rub. No one dares bring the issue forward again for two reasons. The initial publicity could cause a multitude of problems when media coverage reveals to the masses that the law only covers a specific type of craft. Additionally, what happens if the ammendment fails again, this time with a much larger potential audience of overnight water campers playing close attention? No one wants that headache, so it is easier to play word games and puposely cause confusion over the issue. The sad part of all this? The belief by some that if someone in a boatload of fishermen falls asleep, the operator can be cited for "overnight anchoring". The absurd that you can't boat at night with one or more of your passengers taking a snooze. What bothers me about this particular faulty statute is that the State persists in creating a myth in the belief that most people will act like sheep, and blindly not question the regulation. And the saddest part is that they are right, in this particular instance. In closing, I have said it before and will repeat it again, I think that the law should be simply ammended to include all watercraft. The fact that the folks in position to make this happen won't is a sad statement on how convoluted politics have become in my State. Off the soapbox, it's time to brush my teeth and go to bed....I promise not to spit into my neighbor's yard!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
|
This could be another case of conflicting boating laws.
I looked up as many RSA's pertaining to mooring that I could find. If I read most of them correctly you CAN moor a "houseboat" in NH IF you own the property that you are moored in front of, have permission or are renting it. Here's what I was able to find! RSA 270-A:1 Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Airwaves; 07-15-2008 at 10:35 PM. Reason: Adding Bold |
||||||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
YUCK...... We have done a DNA test over here in the bay. What they've found is our feathered friends are better off in the oven. For completely green and environmental reasons, of course. ![]() Sometimes, people are just silly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
...last week I dropped a pair of sunglasses into the lake. Plastic sunglasses...
![]() ![]()
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
This makes no sense, at least the way the MP states it, "any boat anchored with people sleeping is in violation". This is in direct conflict with the wording of the law, or why else would there be the need to amend the law to include the verbage of "all vessels"?
If I were to take my bowrider out and spend the night on it and was cited I would definitely fight it and seems like there is no way I could loose. I don't have a bathroom onboard and have no "sleeping facilities" other than the floor or a fold down back to back seat which the manufacturer labels as a "lounge" not a "bed". Far as I'm concerned the state really needs to clarify this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Why all the angst? We know that the Marine Patrol turns off its phones at 2 am!
Just "Party-Hearty" until 2 am, then sleep it off until the lake wakes up the next morning.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|