Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2025, 10:49 AM   #1
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,157
Thanks: 3
Thanked 701 Times in 580 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk View Post
Just for clarity, the 40+ year mean (i.e."normal") level of the lake is 11" less than full pool at this time of year. The excess drop is 7 3/4". Bad enough, but not almost 19".
Is that the target? 11" below full pool at this time of year?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2025, 11:23 AM   #2
BillTex
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Freedom (state of mind)
Posts: 194
Thanks: 35
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Default

As noted earlier, we are on another ( very nearby) dam controlled lake and are not having any of these issues.
Kind of curious isn’t it?
BillTex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2025, 12:03 PM   #3
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,157
Thanks: 3
Thanked 701 Times in 580 Posts
Default

Which lake?
Is it part of the Winnipesaukee Watershed?

It may have a different management system based on those specific needs.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2025, 06:46 AM   #4
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,282
Thanks: 220
Thanked 506 Times in 295 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Is that the target? 11" below full pool at this time of year?
It is my understanding that they use the 40+ year mean as a guideline to aim for. Other factors also weigh in. For example, in the Spring, downstream flooding concerns may cause the dam management to let the lake to go higher than the "target". They draw down starting in June to gradually prepare for Spring snowmelt and rain but that is done over 6 months and may deviate for a while and recover later.

It is a good question if the mean, which reflects past management choices of the dam and the weather, is a "good" target. However, if not, what should it be? Any changes would have both positive and negative impacts in a complex system. Further, we are accommodated to the current system. We usually know what to expect and, mostly, how to deal with it.

There are also lots of stakeholders in the dam management decisions, with sometimes conflicting needs. Any changes might fix some problems and create even bigger ones, some we don't envision with consequences that could be hard to fix. Any discussions would involve people who have a stake in the outcome that could push the outcome in a specific direction that, overall, would satisfy them but cause an uproar after the full impact of any changes are felt. A "political" decision made now might be a bad one 2 years from now. Even turning it over to "experts" might fail to understand all factors.

That doesn't mean we should be paralyzed, just cautious.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2025, 08:21 AM   #5
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 4,537
Thanks: 2,506
Thanked 1,296 Times in 833 Posts
Unhappy

10 day forecast, no rain in sight,
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.12693 seconds