Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2025, 08:55 AM   #1
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

The enforcement of the new law will be at the retailer.

For the most part, we will be able to sell organic fertilizer with higher levels of phosphorus and sell chemical fertilizer with a P-rating of approximately 15 for starter. Turfgrass maintenance chemical fertilizer should be no phosphorus versions.

10-10-10 is common among farmers developing or reclaiming new pasture.

There is no legal status other than the education of when not to apply that will be invoked to the land owner.

If the retail sells 10-10-10, but the landowner applies double the recommended quantity, the law does not cover that; nor does it cover a landowner doing so on established turfgrass.

So all the ''enforcement'' should be at the wholesale/retail level currently.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2025, 10:31 AM   #2
retired
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Belmont, NH
Posts: 200
Thanks: 2
Thanked 78 Times in 46 Posts
Default

We could always abdicate our responsibility and blame it on climate change.
retired is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to retired For This Useful Post:
Tofu (06-30-2025)
Old 07-11-2025, 11:34 AM   #3
Pam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retired View Post
We could always abdicate our responsibility and blame it on climate change.
Last summer's early cyanobacteria warnings came after an almost non-existent ice-in during the 2024 winter. According to what I've read, climate change IS a factor, and we need to address that also. Obviously the issues with fertilizer, poor septic systems, etc can be addressed more immediately. But there's no doubt the recent winters, on the whole, have been warmer making a solid ice-in more rare. We can approach this problem from many levels.
Pam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2025, 12:59 PM   #4
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 4,433
Thanks: 2,432
Thanked 1,271 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam View Post
Last summer's early cyanobacteria warnings came after an almost non-existent ice-in during the 2024 winter. According to what I've read, climate change IS a factor, and we need to address that also. Obviously the issues with fertilizer, poor septic systems, etc can be addressed more immediately. But there's no doubt the recent winters, on the whole, have been warmer making a solid ice-in more rare. We can approach this problem from many levels.
That's a political "hot potato", not something to be discussed here!
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2025, 07:09 PM   #5
Pam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
That's a political "hot potato", not something to be discussed here!
There's nothing political about recognizing what factors are contributing to the increase in cyanobacteria warnings. I mean, is it political to acknowledge that there have been more winters recently with an incomplete or shorter ice-in period? That's just fact. And apparently it contributes to cyanobacteria, along with other factors.

Jeesh.
Pam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pam For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (07-12-2025)
Sponsored Links
Old 07-12-2025, 07:38 AM   #6
West Alton Joe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
Default

If the climate never changed, then none of us would be participating in this Winnipesaukee forum. 10,000 years ago, the climate changed, a glacier melted and created Lake Winnipesaukee. Here is an article that describes this:

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/boat...3a8814057.html

Now rather than focusing on climate change as the primary cause of the lakeÂ’s current problems (which may or may not be true), your efforts would be much better served to hold the local towns and DES responsible to be better stewards of protecting the lake. Pulling back the curtain on the town of Alton and how they have addressed a major development project in West Alton would be a good start. We used to live there but we now moved to Virginia because of this. People need to wake up and protect the valuable resource called Lake Winnipesaukee.
West Alton Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to West Alton Joe For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (07-12-2025)
Old 07-12-2025, 11:09 AM   #7
Pam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by West Alton Joe View Post
If the climate never changed, then none of us would be participating in this Winnipesaukee forum. 10,000 years ago, the climate changed, a glacier melted and created Lake Winnipesaukee. Here is an article that describes this:

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/boat...3a8814057.html

Now rather than focusing on climate change as the primary cause of the lakeÂ’s current problems (which may or may not be true), your efforts would be much better served to hold the local towns and DES responsible to be better stewards of protecting the lake. Pulling back the curtain on the town of Alton and how they have addressed a major development project in West Alton would be a good start. We used to live there but we now moved to Virginia because of this. People need to wake up and protect the valuable resource called Lake Winnipesaukee.
Completely agree. We should do all we can here and now to try to combat this problem. My point is that we can do several things at once, both short term and long term. Yes, of course the climate has changed over time. But I don't see how anyone can doubt that human pollution of the air has been contributing to more rapid changes than would ordinarily take place. I mean, no-one argues that spewing pollution into bodies of water causes all kind of problems. Why is there an argument about the need to reduce emissions into the atmosphere? Who doesn't want cleaner air? Sorry- I don't get it. But yes, local education and efforts are of crucial importance.
Pam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2025, 05:53 PM   #8
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

These new projects will not have a dramatic impact on the lake.
Even new lakefront construction is done with tighter regulations than just a few years ago.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2025, 06:07 PM   #9
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,952
Thanks: 796
Thanked 1,497 Times in 1,042 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
These new projects will not have a dramatic impact on the lake.
Even new lakefront construction is done with tighter regulations than just a few years ago.
This spring when Ctr Harbor Beach was closed due to e coli everybody was posting about people's septic systems running into the lake etc. The Ctr Harbor Fire Dept posted a release saying it wasn't from all that. They said there are no septic systems there, they are all on the pipeline to Franklin.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2025, 12:42 AM   #10
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

I think the new law is as far as they are going on septic or lawn fertilizer.

They will keep looking at surface run-off. But the newest development has more of that being figured into the planning stages than we might have done in the past.

Locally, we had an issue for a while, I solved it on my property for the entire neighborhood. Now during a rainstorm, everything drains into my retention pit.

I get the benefit of any excess from my neighbors free.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2025, 08:10 AM   #11
West Alton Joe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
These new projects will not have a dramatic impact on the lake.
Even new lakefront construction is done with tighter regulations than just a few years ago.
Nonsense, Mr. Mercier. Perhaps if the various local boards and state agencies actually followed the rules, your statement might be valid, but as someone who lived near a big development project in West Alton I can tell you that the rules were not enforced. As I had mentioned before, anyone who is concerned about the health and wellbeing of Lake Winnipesaukee should take the time to research the project. It was the primary reason we decided to leave Alton. Start asking questions.
West Alton Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2025, 12:29 PM   #12
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

There is not going to be septic run-off from the Grimm property down and across the highway into the lake.
There will also not be septic run-off from the LSS property into the lake.

There will also be no phosphate in the fertilizers sold for any turfgrass for either project or to any homeowner per the new law.

The State has been around twice already to verify that signage, and procurement procedures are changing at retail locations.
Just last year, we did not have that law.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2025, 12:49 PM   #13
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,600
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,109 Posts
Default More info?

Quote:
Originally Posted by West Alton Joe View Post
Nonsense, Mr. Mercier. Perhaps if the various local boards and state agencies actually followed the rules, your statement might be valid, but as someone who lived near a big development project in West Alton I can tell you that the rules were not enforced. As I had mentioned before, anyone who is concerned about the health and wellbeing of Lake Winnipesaukee should take the time to research the project. It was the primary reason we decided to leave Alton. Start asking questions.
For those of us who aren't next door, it would be of interest and helpful to know more about the alleged violations, location, remedies, etc. Were there no protests/questions at the time? What about the local conservation commission? They're usually paying attention. Did you ask them? Local CC's are great protectors for us all.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2025, 05:10 PM   #14
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

There were protests in the meetings.
The Grimm's were hoping to do something commercial in a residential area.

They pulled that.

On the Mount recently, we had contractor appreciation night.
We spent some time discussing the original proposal and what we expect will be the new one.

New one is still a guess, but the consensus on the guess is house, barn and orchard.
The consensus guess is about avoiding the need to change the zoning or get abatements.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2025, 01:05 PM   #15
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Slowing climate change or the aging of the lake is a daunting task.
We live in a world were people no longer relax.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.12849 seconds