![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
The enforcement of the new law will be at the retailer.
For the most part, we will be able to sell organic fertilizer with higher levels of phosphorus and sell chemical fertilizer with a P-rating of approximately 15 for starter. Turfgrass maintenance chemical fertilizer should be no phosphorus versions. 10-10-10 is common among farmers developing or reclaiming new pasture. There is no legal status other than the education of when not to apply that will be invoked to the land owner. If the retail sells 10-10-10, but the landowner applies double the recommended quantity, the law does not cover that; nor does it cover a landowner doing so on established turfgrass. So all the ''enforcement'' should be at the wholesale/retail level currently. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
|
Last summer's early cyanobacteria warnings came after an almost non-existent ice-in during the 2024 winter. According to what I've read, climate change IS a factor, and we need to address that also. Obviously the issues with fertilizer, poor septic systems, etc can be addressed more immediately. But there's no doubt the recent winters, on the whole, have been warmer making a solid ice-in more rare. We can approach this problem from many levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 4,433
Thanks: 2,432
Thanked 1,271 Times in 814 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Jeesh. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Pam For This Useful Post: | ||
FlyingScot (07-12-2025) | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
If the climate never changed, then none of us would be participating in this Winnipesaukee forum. 10,000 years ago, the climate changed, a glacier melted and created Lake Winnipesaukee. Here is an article that describes this:
https://www.laconiadailysun.com/boat...3a8814057.html Now rather than focusing on climate change as the primary cause of the lakeÂ’s current problems (which may or may not be true), your efforts would be much better served to hold the local towns and DES responsible to be better stewards of protecting the lake. Pulling back the curtain on the town of Alton and how they have addressed a major development project in West Alton would be a good start. We used to live there but we now moved to Virginia because of this. People need to wake up and protect the valuable resource called Lake Winnipesaukee. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to West Alton Joe For This Useful Post: | ||
FlyingScot (07-12-2025) | ||
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 22
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
These new projects will not have a dramatic impact on the lake.
Even new lakefront construction is done with tighter regulations than just a few years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,952
Thanks: 796
Thanked 1,497 Times in 1,042 Posts
|
This spring when Ctr Harbor Beach was closed due to e coli everybody was posting about people's septic systems running into the lake etc. The Ctr Harbor Fire Dept posted a release saying it wasn't from all that. They said there are no septic systems there, they are all on the pipeline to Franklin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
I think the new law is as far as they are going on septic or lawn fertilizer.
They will keep looking at surface run-off. But the newest development has more of that being figured into the planning stages than we might have done in the past. Locally, we had an issue for a while, I solved it on my property for the entire neighborhood. Now during a rainstorm, everything drains into my retention pit. I get the benefit of any excess from my neighbors free. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
Nonsense, Mr. Mercier. Perhaps if the various local boards and state agencies actually followed the rules, your statement might be valid, but as someone who lived near a big development project in West Alton I can tell you that the rules were not enforced. As I had mentioned before, anyone who is concerned about the health and wellbeing of Lake Winnipesaukee should take the time to research the project. It was the primary reason we decided to leave Alton. Start asking questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
There is not going to be septic run-off from the Grimm property down and across the highway into the lake.
There will also not be septic run-off from the LSS property into the lake. There will also be no phosphate in the fertilizers sold for any turfgrass for either project or to any homeowner per the new law. The State has been around twice already to verify that signage, and procurement procedures are changing at retail locations. Just last year, we did not have that law. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,600
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,109 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
There were protests in the meetings.
The Grimm's were hoping to do something commercial in a residential area. They pulled that. On the Mount recently, we had contractor appreciation night. We spent some time discussing the original proposal and what we expect will be the new one. New one is still a guess, but the consensus on the guess is house, barn and orchard. The consensus guess is about avoiding the need to change the zoning or get abatements. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Slowing climate change or the aging of the lake is a daunting task.
We live in a world were people no longer relax. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|