![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Quote:
I wouldn't use the previous argument as number 4 is not going to be improved with higher rates of travel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,537
Thanks: 2,455
Thanked 5,468 Times in 2,143 Posts
|
Quote:
86 dB measured at 50 feet for any boat mfg. before 1978, 84 dB for boats mfg. between 1978 and 1981, 82 dB for any boat mfg. after 1981 Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Then the may need a kicker in the proposal for more enforcement.
If the major argument is speed, they would need to have a trial period to test if the 45mph is really necessary... that can easily be placed in the bill with a sunset clause. But it may not be enough without enhancing enforcement on the other issues that keep them from getting the number of votes necessary to get it out of committee with an OTP. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,537
Thanks: 2,455
Thanked 5,468 Times in 2,143 Posts
|
Quote:
Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post: | ||
VitaBene (01-26-2023) | ||
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 716
Thanks: 149
Thanked 336 Times in 205 Posts
|
After much debate and deliberation, the speed limit was passed. Since then, the number of boats and jet skis has increased dramatically. It's a fools errand to change the speed limit. Time to let it go and move on.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Not very bored.
But I would presume that all the issues relating to the entire lake would not come into play for just the Broads. Radio/stereo use is a newer issue. Not really related to speed. But maybe enough to get more committee members on-board with at least a trial change in the limit. As I noted with my tenure for the OHRV... the issues, though seemingly the same, change dramatically over just a few years. Technology changes, usage patterns change, number of vehicles change... But not sure that it changes that much from one legislative session to the next... |
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (02-21-2023) | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|