Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2023, 10:16 AM   #1
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
I agree that alcohol, wake boats and the other things on your list are problems. But they are not in question here, so they are beside the point...

There's no doubt that the Be Loud aspect is a big reason for the opposition to keeping the speed limit as-is. It's kind of funny that the folks who want to increase the limit keep ignoring/dismissing this and asserting that safety is the ONLY reason, then through up a whole bunch of smoke around safety.
They could include a limit on noise within the proposal, and that may get them more votes.
I wouldn't use the previous argument as number 4 is not going to be improved with higher rates of travel.
John Mercier is offline  
Old 01-24-2023, 10:43 AM   #2
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,537
Thanks: 2,455
Thanked 5,468 Times in 2,143 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
They could include a limit on noise within the proposal, and that may get them more votes.
There is already a decibel limit law for all boats in the State of NH...

86 dB measured at 50 feet for any boat mfg. before 1978, 84 dB for boats mfg. between 1978 and 1981, 82 dB for any boat mfg. after 1981

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline  
Old 01-24-2023, 10:48 AM   #3
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Then the may need a kicker in the proposal for more enforcement.

If the major argument is speed, they would need to have a trial period to test if the 45mph is really necessary... that can easily be placed in the bill with a sunset clause.

But it may not be enough without enhancing enforcement on the other issues that keep them from getting the number of votes necessary to get it out of committee with an OTP.
John Mercier is offline  
Old 01-24-2023, 11:09 AM   #4
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,537
Thanks: 2,455
Thanked 5,468 Times in 2,143 Posts
Default Been There Done That

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
If the major argument is speed, they would need to have a trial period to test if the 45mph is really necessary... that can easily be placed in the bill with a sunset clause.
This exact trial period was done years ago before the speed limit was enacted...If your bored...very bored...look through the speed limit debate archives for all the pertinent information regarding this.

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
VitaBene (01-26-2023)
Old 01-24-2023, 11:28 AM   #5
Garcia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 716
Thanks: 149
Thanked 336 Times in 205 Posts
Default Let it go

After much debate and deliberation, the speed limit was passed. Since then, the number of boats and jet skis has increased dramatically. It's a fools errand to change the speed limit. Time to let it go and move on.
Garcia is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Garcia For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (01-24-2023), mcdude (01-24-2023)
Sponsored Links
Old 01-24-2023, 11:29 AM   #6
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,003
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Not very bored.
But I would presume that all the issues relating to the entire lake would not come into play for just the Broads.

Radio/stereo use is a newer issue. Not really related to speed. But maybe enough to get more committee members on-board with at least a trial change in the limit.

As I noted with my tenure for the OHRV... the issues, though seemingly the same, change dramatically over just a few years. Technology changes, usage patterns change, number of vehicles change...

But not sure that it changes that much from one legislative session to the next...
John Mercier is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
ApS (02-21-2023)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.12932 seconds