![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,987
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,597
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,109 Posts
|
Transparency is a word we hear a lot and mostly ignore. Let's be transparent here and state our position. In my case, I own a rental residence and I own a rental boat slip. It's hard to raise the rents on a residence because, if the tenant leaves, I may have to re-paint, replace carpet, advertise and have vacant times with no rent. The goal is to keep the tenant in place, right? In the case of a boat slip, there is no expense to turnover, except perhaps vacancy. There is a wait list of tenants who will, pay a higher rent, if that's the market. That's the way it is today. In some years, there is no wait list, and I get no rent at all, or I reduce the price to find a way to cover some, if not all of my expenses, mortgage, dues, taxes. In that case, I can't sell, no buyers, or the price is a loss if I sell. This is all pretty basic, but posters on this topic should indicate their perspective, not just a position from Economics 101.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,987
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
|
Wouldn't that just be you deciding that the extra cost is not worth the possible increased return?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|