Staffing Issues for Summer of 2021

[ApS]

Past...

Originally Posted by FlyingScot

It's nihilistic (and also unfair) to respond to half a dozen citations with nothing other than "it's clear...no studies will convince me...".

You should post some real studies with real data from real researchers. Otherwise, it's just BS

"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?

Originally Posted by gillygirl

NPR is rated with a left-center bias which provides highly factual information...hardly a cesspool in comparison to the source you provided.

"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".
https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5

[gillygirl]

Originally Posted by ApS

Past...

"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?

"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".

https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5

Your response is Dershowitz and Carlson? Bwaaahaaahaaahaaa! Thanks for the laugh.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

[ApS]

Originally Posted by gillygirl

Your response is Dershowitz and Carlson? Bwaaahaaahaaahaaa! Thanks for the laugh.

It was not my intent to demonstrate "Confirmation-Bias", but thanks for doing so.

[gillygirl]

Originally Posted by ApS

It was not my intent to demonstrate "Confirmation-Bias", but thanks for doing so.

Not really. My sources are news organizations, not talking heads who are pandering to their base. Nice try though.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

[ApS]

Originally Posted by gillygirl

Not really. My sources are news organizations, not talking heads who are pandering to their base. Nice try though.

It was not my intent to illuminate the "personalize and polarize" portion of Rule #13, but thanks for doing so.

[Heaven]

Originally Posted by ApS

Past...


"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?


"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".
https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5

Well I listened to the link you provided to the Dershow, because I generally think he is an intelligent guy, but I had to quit when he referred to the Tucker Carlton guest as "the witness". Now, maybe it was a slip of the tongue, or maybe it was a mindset. But he just blew up his credibility on this issue.