Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2017, 08:58 PM   #1
RUGMAN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: weirs beach,
Posts: 311
Thanks: 39
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
Default R.E. Taxes

DidI read that in the new tax plan, they plan to limit the real estate tax deduction on your income tax return to $10,000.00
RUGMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2017, 09:23 PM   #2
Woody38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 584
Thanks: 45
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts
Post

California Prop 13 did wonders for a select few property owners. A real headache for others. When we bought our house in California we had to make up for property tax shortfall (not sure what else to call it). The amount was not terrible since the previous owner had been hit with an increase also. The little old lady across the street having lived in that house for decades paid $900 yearly thanks to prop 13. We paid $9,000 the first year and paid a sum to make up for whatever should have been paid the year we bought. My sister and her husband pay around $1,200 to $1,300 on their million dollar + house. Also they could sell that house and buy another house or condo and take the tax with them. By the way my B-I-L thought that his children having to pay higher taxes was their problem. Great perk for some elderly, not us. So it amounts to those new buyers paying exorbitant property taxes. Why should not all property owners share in the burden. They don't require any less city service than we do.
All in all the prop 13 sucks.
Woody38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2017, 08:34 AM   #3
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 3,163
Thanks: 750
Thanked 2,277 Times in 986 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody38 View Post
Why should not all property owners share in the burden. They don't require any less city service than we do.
All in all the prop 13 sucks.
That is not the way the tax system is set up. If you were taxed based upon what services you use it would be about the opposite of what it is now. They would add taxes for each child instead of allowing a deduction. It would make the system unworkable since the bulk of many budgets are for the schools. If only the people with children in the school system paid taxes for that it would turn the system upside down.

One of the few taxes that have been based on actual use is the gas tax or "road use tax". However, the increasing use of hybrid vehicles is skewing that too. Should there be a "Prius" tax?

No matter what the system is some group will find it unfair.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2017, 11:41 PM   #4
Jersey Bob
Senior Member
 
Jersey Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 84
Thanks: 76
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default House plan

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUGMAN View Post
DidI read that in the new tax plan, they plan to limit the real estate tax deduction on your income tax return to $10,000.00
That's the house plan, the Senate plan is to not allow any deduction for property tax.
Jersey Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2017, 05:56 AM   #5
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,174
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 310
Thanked 1,103 Times in 812 Posts
Default

Moultonborough has the best tennis court venue around, with 4 two-tone, light green, dark green courts placed side by side, making it a big four court space with a standard chain link fence all around. Plus, Moultonborough hires www.vttennis.com to redo the rubberized asphalt court surface on a regular rotational basis, doing one or two courts every year.

Overall, the Moultonborough recreation area is extremely scenic, and includes a baseball/softball field next to the tennis courts that is currently having the entire outfield replaced with new turf or something using a large Caterpillar bulldozer.

Ashland: two outdoor courts; Center Harbor: two outdoor courts, Meredith: six outdoor courts, two with night lights; Laconia: maybe four and two outdoor courts in two locations, Moultonborough: four tennis courts with two pickle-ball courts lined dark red within the last tennis court. All these court facilities are all very nice in their own way, and it just seems to me that the Moultonborough facility is just a little bit nicer partly because it is very scenic.

All these different public tennis court venues are free to use by anyone, first come-first serve, for playing tennis.

What M-boro really really needs is a 15-million dollar athletic center, 5-million/venue, that is home to indoor tennis, indoor swim pool, and indoor ice arena ... all totally heated and air conditioned for year 'round use ... located on the existing seasonal hockey rink area plus the woods.

Thank-you very much, www.moultonboroughnh.gov and all you happy M-boro property tax payers ...... so very happy, happy, happy ... thanks a million!!
__________________
.... Banned for life from local thrift store!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-20-2017, 09:33 AM   #6
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,953
Thanks: 484
Thanked 703 Times in 393 Posts
Default

Fat's a trolling, a trolling he will go.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2017, 11:12 AM   #7
garysanfran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco/Meredith
Posts: 1,640
Thanks: 728
Thanked 705 Times in 363 Posts
Default It's true...

California has a lot of revenue producers not found in NH. However, the amount I save in prop. tax under Prop.13 is about $29,000 per year. That covers a lot of the increase fees I pay other than prop. tax.

We also have expenses not found in NH...Lots, LOTS of illegal immigrants. Tons...TONS of homeless (everyday San Fran sends out crews to clean the encampments...maid service. I clean my own home), multi-billion dollar trains that go from nowhere to nowhere.

Also, because real estate is so expensive here....013% of $2,000,000 = $26,000. Still a good chunk of change. WHAT! Two Million Dollars? The honest truth here, is you can't get a habitable place for much less.

Please don't get me wrong, I'd prefer living in NH, but growing up back there, I find the winters are a bit harsh.
__________________
Gary
~~~~_/) ~~~
~~~~~~~~
garysanfran is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.14340 seconds