Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Lake Issues > General Issues
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2016, 02:51 PM   #1
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Actually Moultonborough zoning is at minimum lot size, page 3 of :

file:///C:/Users/Joseph/AppData/Local/Temp/ZONING%20ORDINANCE%20Final%20adopted%2003-11-15.pdf



" Larger lot sizes may be required in accordance with the characteristics of each lot. Square footage is set forth as the minimum per dwelling unit required, and no less than 40,000 square feet shall be permitted for each lot, whether or not the lot contains a septic system.
The Town is divided into residential/agricultural zone and three commercial zones, as defined in ....

As stated, blogger is at it again. This weeks Town Administrator report shows the blogger and the Rec. Director, discussed the towns summer programs. I guess he's appointed himself as the recreation guru.

He wants Al Hume off the Recreation Advisory Board. Al doesn't bow down and kiss junta feet. al should ell him them what to kiss!

As Sue Doe-Nym, rightfully point out, blogger made up the "stats" for his presentation and then expanded his creativity for his second presentation.

Motto: If ya can't dazzle 'em with brilliance ... baffle 'em with bull****!
longislander is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 08:26 PM   #2
winni83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 439
Thanks: 17
Thanked 218 Times in 138 Posts
Default

This is what my Selectman has to say about those who disagree with him and put their disagreement and opinions in a public forum.

"Anonymous said...
Don't know where to put this. The blog has become a kinder, gentler forum of late and that is a good thing. Don't be discouraged by the handful of blowhards. You are greatly appreciated.
March 31, 2016 at 9:49 PM

Moultonboro Blogger said...
The blowhards have apparently not yet finished their smear and lies campaign, just moved it elsewhere because they are not allowed here. They just can't seem to accept any responsibility for the consequences their actions have caused. The idle threats, the accusations, the ignorant comments, pretty sophomoric. Mostly they are becoming the butt of running jokes. A sad bunch.
April 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM"

Election time next year, with the right to cast absentee ballots when voting for the Selectmen who are up for reelection, namely Messrs. Blogger and Wakefield, should be interesting.
winni83 is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 09:25 PM   #3
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Quote:
Moultonboro Blogger said...
The blowhards have apparently not yet finished their smear and lies campaign, just moved it elsewhere because they are not allowed here. They just can't seem to accept any responsibility for the consequences their actions have caused. The idle threats, the accusations, the ignorant comments, pretty sophomoric. Mostly they are becoming the butt of running jokes. A sad bunch.
April 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM"
What is he taking about? He is the blowhard in chief!
Does he actually believe all the bloviating he does on his personal soapbox?

Smears ... lies ... idle threats ...

He's gone off the deep end!
longislander is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 09:31 PM   #4
winni83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 439
Thanks: 17
Thanked 218 Times in 138 Posts
Default Wrongislander???

I would treat the comment as a badge of honor.

Moultonboro Blogger said...
Only took about 4 minutes "wrongislander". Gee, wonder who that could be?
April 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM
Post a Comment
winni83 is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 09:45 PM   #5
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

It's nice posting here, on a blog that has published rules, and allows comment, with no preconceived requirement to bowing to the blogger.

Strange phenomenon, not having a webmaster, blogger, be the prime commenter, and preaching perceived realities. Others see the same as dilutions!
longislander is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 04-04-2016, 07:56 AM   #6
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Looks like the only posting, on the so-called MoBo blog is the blogger's!

Something about a Napoleonic complex.


Consecutive comments on the same thread:

Quote:
Moultonboro Blogger said...

The blowhards have apparently not yet finished their smear and lies campaign, just moved it elsewhere because they are not allowed here. They just can't seem to accept any responsibility for the consequences their actions have caused. The idle threats, the accusations, the ignorant comments, pretty sophomoric. Mostly they are becoming the butt of running jokes. A sad bunch.
April 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM

Moultonboro Blogger said...

Only took about 4 minutes "wrongislander". Gee, wonder who that could be?
April 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM

Moultonboro Blogger said...

Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
April 3, 2016 at 10:12 PM

Post a Comment "
longislander is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:25 PM   #7
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Quote:
Anonymous said...

Blogger, please expound on the "consequences of their action". What do you mean? The majority of the people at the town meeting wanted to vote.
April 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM


Moultonboro Blogger said...

A premeditated move to call the question denied the public the opportunity to have a democratic discussion of the issue and for others to expose the misinformation that was spread about town. Win or lose the vote or whether the majority wanted to vote or not, public discourse was quelled by a well organized group. The people responsible refuse to accept the consequences and fiasco that followed.
April 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM

Someone was allowed to ask a question on the blog, and an opportunity for
quite a response.

I may be repeating myself, but ...

I was the "well organized group" that Called the Question. I had notified the Town Moderator and the BoS, as well earlier, that I would not be submitting an amendment to Article 2, as previously emailed to them. The wife and I had received news, that we might not be able to attend the Town meeting due to unforeseen family issues.

I left the Town Meeting right after I got up, and made the motion to Call the Question, and voted. I was congratulated and thanked by numerous folks on the way out. Folks that I don't know. I noticed, in the parking lot, there were many leaving, as well, having voted.

I had not even premeditated the motion. I had expected to get there, vote and get out.

What happened was, one by one, the BoS started to give (on stage) lengthy, written speeches about why everyone should vote yes. At the third BoS member (of 5) I was standing at the mike ready to end the agony of the audience.

The majority of the audience, obviously, agreed, the motion overwhelmingly passed.

I had no idea it would cause such a "hissy-fit" by our illustrious BoS!

The consequence and fiasco ...????????????? The public prevailed!

The misinformation was/is spread by the blog and its lemmings.
longislander is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:17 PM   #8
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,457
Thanks: 759
Thanked 796 Times in 419 Posts
Default

Wait until the Blogger sees what a real "premeditated" move is come next March. Many people have a long memory about the misinformation dumped on them by the Blogger and can't wait to show their real opinion in the voting booth. Most likely Joel will be running again and he should have no trouble getting elected.
Sue Doe-Nym is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:37 PM   #9
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Quote:
Most likely Joel will be running again and he should have no trouble getting elected.
Joel did a good job. He spent many years as Chair of the BoS. There's a reason he decide a couple of days before election to run as a write-in and got many votes.

Election results:

http://www.moultonboroughnh.gov/Page...s/2288_001.pdf
longislander is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 10:50 PM   #10
Ski Bum
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Interesting thread. Joel's had his turn. Time for new blood and new ideas. What's the story with the Moultonboro Speaks blog? Has someone else taken it over?
Ski Bum is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Ski Bum For This Useful Post:
Packardrider (04-06-2016)
Old 04-06-2016, 07:33 AM   #11
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Quote:
Interesting thread. Joel's had his turn. Time for new blood and new ideas. What's the story with the Moultonboro Speaks blog? Has someone else taken it over?
The blog is still "Owned" by the same individual. There are a lot of us that have stopped posting, and scan it, now and then to see what king of inside info he'll post. He is still a Select Board member.

There may be a problem with his perception of "select", however. He doesn't tolerate, nor accept opposing views. He may soon, however, to try to revive the participation. He'll post a token different view. It might be his own "anonymous" post to his own blog, incognito! Ya Right!

He may be confusing "select" as some kind of anointment from God.

The use of "I", "me", "mine" may be an indicator of issues.
longislander is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to longislander For This Useful Post:
Shipfitter (04-06-2016)
Old 04-06-2016, 08:34 AM   #12
Packardrider
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Remember

Those who fail to remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Packardrider is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Packardrider For This Useful Post:
longislander (04-06-2016)
Old 04-06-2016, 01:57 PM   #13
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Talk about flipping mindsets for convenience.

Here's the MoBo blogger today, on his blog:

Quote:
My answer is the same as I stated at candidates night in 2014: the majority of citizens in Moultonboro do not want SB2 and I would not support it.
Here is what his position was when he was championing it (from Foster's, by the same reporter who now covers MoBo for the Meredith News):

Quote:
Resident Paul Punturieri made a presentation on behalf of the Moultonborough Citizen's Alliance in favor of SB2.
I was not personally involved in that town battle at the time, but it didn't take much to get a pulse, on the lies and untruths about what SB-2 is and does, since. He should have stuck to truism. Then again, he wasn't part of the town power base back then!

I do not believe SB-2 would pass in Moultonborough, just as an Official Budget Committee (as opposed to the present Advisory Budget Committee) would not pass, either. Not because the mechanisms will not work fine for MoBo, but because the present power base would sabotage any effort to pass them.

There's no great necessity for either, anyway. Ignorance is bliss, and the Annual Town Meeting is a favorite get-together for a lot of folks ... what the heck, so be it. Lunch sandwiches, with an apple, a beverage, a cookie is only five dollars!
longislander is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 04:07 PM   #14
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 585
Thanks: 53
Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Looks like blogger is reading the forum!
I'm not allowed on the blog. I use my name and email address ... in the open ... and not afraid of debate.

I just went back to the blog and tried to figure out why he's so upset. I think he is confusing me with:
Quote:
Anonymous said...

Blogger:

Quote from Fosters' Daily Democrat on February 11, 2009:

"Resident Paul Punturieri made a presentation on behalf of the Moultonborough Citizen's Alliance in favor of SB2.

Care to explain your change in position

April 6, 2016 at 3:00 PM
I thank this forum's webmaster for transparency, rather than censorship.

Quote:
So who's pushing SB-2 this time?
April 6, 2016 at 1:33 PM

Quote:
Moultonboro Blogger said...

Anon at 1:33- Did you not read the post? Do you have nothing better to do with your day than find whatever you can as a " gotcha"? If so, I will keep you in my prayers in hopes you will find a purpose in life. I suspect that you are one of the deceivers that continue to spread the lies that I fabricated data or that I flip flopped. In your world, no one can ever change a position or have a change of heart based upon the facts. Maybe a second prayer that you will find enlightenment. Perhaps you could show some integrity and stop hiding behind " Sue doe-nyms". Doubt it was you as she is not an SB2 fan.
April 6, 2016 at 3:27 PM

Last edited by longislander; 04-06-2016 at 04:23 PM. Reason: addendum
longislander is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.11532 seconds