![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 848
Thanks: 116
Thanked 212 Times in 134 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,953
Thanks: 484
Thanked 703 Times in 393 Posts
|
Quote:
Yes, I'm well aware of the physics of a pwc, I have two, one weighs 700 pounds and the other weighs 960 lbs. A collision at 20 mph would be devastating to the boat and jet ski. And typically the pwc is going much faster than that when trying to jump a wake. It would be even worse for a tuber. It's not an abrupt turn and point at the jet ski, it's more like a gentle turn to bring the boat between the jet ski and the tuber. It never gets close, but it moves the wake away from the jet skier, who is typically focused on the wake and not the boat or more importantly the tuber. It's not a power struggle, it's protection of the person on the tube from a jet skier focused on the wave more than where they are going. In fact, most of the time the pwc rider who does this is clueless as to the danger they put the tuber in as they zig back and forth behind the tuber trying to hit the wake before it loses its peak. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: exeter, nh
Posts: 73
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
As mentioned earlier, it's easier all the way around if you just keep 150'. It used to be fun riding my Ducati between cars in and out of lanes. That doesn't make is smart or considerate. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|