![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Nashua/Winnisquam
Posts: 282
Thanks: 106
Thanked 96 Times in 49 Posts
|
My version of firefox works fine using http://wolfeborocam.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
When I read about your problem I thought of this video. It's an old one but it's still funny to me:
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 129
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 89
Thanks: 15
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Funny video Rusty. I was close to that stage!
That did work as you said depasseg. Thanks very much. Can you expand to say how or why it works that way? Can you say how to make that change permanent on the thumb print shown on left side of the web page; otherwise I would need to retype it each time for that one thumb print to open. However I do thank you especially and all who responded. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 129
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
I don't know the exact details, but it is likely an issue on the web server side. The Cpanel error message is from the wolfeboro cam hosting provider, which led me to guess that there was some sort of scripting or redirection error. And I'm guessing that the redirection without an exact hostname (the www part) is handled differently. Maybe someone in web design can correct me.
As for the thumbnail, maybe this site's admin can change the link. Otherwise, I suggest you create your own bookmark or favorite to the operational website until we hear back from the wolfeboro camera admin. I'm glad the workaround helped. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 89
Thanks: 15
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
depasseg,
Thanks again. I have bookmarked the working page and hope the cam admin will make a change that will work. Thank you very much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,947
Thanks: 545
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
Quote:
In this case, www.wolfeborocam.com and wolfeborocam.com (without the www) are going to two different servers (you can tell based on the two different IP addresses): BRK-Air:~ brk$ ping wolfeborocam.com PING wolfeborocam.com (69.94.120.79): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 69.94.120.79: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=27.219 ms 64 bytes from 69.94.120.79: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=33.178 ms ^C --- wolfeborocam.com ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 27.219/30.198/33.178/2.979 ms BRK-Air:~ brk$ ping www.wolfeborocam.com PING www.wolfeborocam.com (216.71.118.243): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.71.118.243: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=22.853 ms 64 bytes from 216.71.118.243: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=25.720 ms ^C --- www.wolfeborocam.com ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 22.853/24.287/25.720/1.434 ms Whoever handles the wolfeborocam.com domain should fix this in DNS and/or tell people linking to the cam to update their links. There isn't anything you can do on your end, the link you're clicking is bad/outdated.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 89
Thanks: 15
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
brk-Int and depasseg,
Thanks for your response brk-Int-quite interesting. Want you both (and all other Forum members) to know that I just recently opened that thumb print in question and it worked to open! So someone must have fixed it. Thanks to webmaster if he intervened for fixing by whoever. I thank you both for your great help. It's a joy to have working again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
I pinged both different addresses and got the same IP number for both of them:
C:\Users\Rusty>ping www.wolfeborocam.com Pinging www.wolfeborocam.com [216.71.118.243] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 216.71.118.243: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 215ms, Average = 72ms C:\Users\Rusty>ping wolfeborocam.com Pinging wolfeborocam.com [216.71.118.243] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=54 Reply from 216.71.118.243: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 216.71.118.243: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 187ms, Average = 90ms
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|