![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
Welcome back Skip. Very well written post.
__________________
SIKSUKR |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,667
Thanks: 3,282
Thanked 1,132 Times in 814 Posts
|
There are a good number of boaters that actually believe the lake speed limit ruling actually supersede the excessive speed ruling. They will argue to the moon, this is so. My interpretation is that the excessive speed ruling prevails when the speed is less than the limit. Correct me if I am wrong but it is common sense.
Mr Pilliod, the bill primary sponsor actually convince the speed limit supporters that the enforcement is and will be there to enforce the law. Kind of a bold statement when the truth says otherwise. Skip is right, administrative cost has been reduced, but staffing remains the same, actually the staffing is less today than it was when the SL became law. Somehow we need to convince the legislature the lake is no more safer today than it was before the SL law. The gold dome is convinced our waterways are safe.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,974
Thanks: 80
Thanked 984 Times in 443 Posts
|
I have to chime in here...
The lake was NEVER unsafe.... considering the number of boats of all types sharing lake Winnipesaukee.. we have VERY FEW to the point of almost 0% boat collisions... the speed limit has done nothing to add to nor detract from the safety of the lake. It is a "feel good" law passed by people who didn't like performance boats. IMHO this lake is as safe as it is for lots of reasons... The first and most important being the 150' rule... no place else has this rule regarding boat vs. boat spacing on the open water. Even if they come well within 150' of you, there is very little risk of collision. The Boater Safety Certificate has also helped... although some might argue otherwise. If people think Performance boats left.. well they are sadly mistaken. The poor economy more than anything else curtailed their use. Not rules, not regulations. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
LIforrelaxin (07-15-2015) | ||
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,947
Thanks: 545
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
I disagree with this, and my reason is essentially summed up in your next statement:
Quote:
1) A rule (150' separation) that is effectively unique to Winnipesaukee 2) Boaters on the lake with no clue at all to proper "rules of the road" and boat operation 3) Boaters on the lake who are familiar with boating, but primarily due to experience on other bodies of water 4) Boaters who are mostly limited to Winnipesaukee but are seasoned and knowledgeable. Every boater essentially falls into one categorization of 2, 3 or 4. The problem is that you never really know WHICH category they fall into. If someone falls into category 3, I don't care if they come closer than 150' to me, as long as they are overall operating safely and carefully. Someone in category 4 will probably generally try to stay 150' away, but might violate that rule in tight spaces, etc. Someone is category 2 is totally unpredictable. So, I can't rely on other boaters to maintain a 150' separation on their own, and if someone gets too close I can't tell if they do so out of ignorance of the rule, incompetence, or something else. There are also lots of people unable to accurately judge 150', so they come too close, or think I am too close, or they veer too far off-course and make their route seem erratic when you are trying to gauge how/where your two vessels will cross. I don't see the 150' rule as being reliable enough to create any real safety aspect, to me it just seems like another feel-good law with good intentions but bad effect.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,974
Thanks: 80
Thanked 984 Times in 443 Posts
|
Brk...
I agree on your classification of boaters... but I disagree with your assessment of the 150' rule. The one thing that needs to be considered with your assessment is the percentage of the different classifications... 1) A rule (150' separation) that is effectively unique to Winnipesaukee Its actually Unique to NH (this changes the percentages) 2) Boaters on the lake with no clue at all to proper "rules of the road" and boat operation. This is probably the lowest percentage of boaters on the lake... at best 3-5% These are your renters and newbies. I think they are the biggest violators, but they are the smallest % of boaters on the lake. 3) Boaters on the lake who are familiar with boating, but primarily due to experience on other bodies of water. This is another low percentage group... probably 4-5%% We do not see a lot of out of state boats on Winni. Because they have experience, they know most of the navigational rules and the probably have some knowledge of the 150' rule. No doubt they tend to shave the distance more often than not because their experience leads them to believe there is no danger if you are closer than 150' 4) Boaters who are mostly limited to Winnipesaukee but are seasoned and knowledgeable. This makes up the majority of the boaters on Lake Winni... a good 85% at least. Group 4 is why the 150' rule works... Group 4 is the reason there are very few Boat vs. Boat collisions on Lake Winnipesaukee. They are the majority and they know the rules. I personally don't get too twisted when someone comes within 150' while on plane unless they are danger close... within 50'. I know of the 150' rule and I am very aware that regardless of the rules, or who violated the rules... The 1 CARDINAL rule is "the Capt is responsible for the safety of the vessel & crew". So in crossing situations, if it looks like the guy doesn't know the rules... I will slow down, alter course slightly or come to a complete stop if I have to. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
__________________
SIKSUKR |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 225
Thanks: 41
Thanked 86 Times in 46 Posts
|
So, it looks like Winnfabbs or some other similar sorry group of individuals are not happy that the performance boats are back and have resorted to routinely bothering the Marine Patrol by calling in to complain about noise and performance boats once again. What a crock.
It must be tough to sit at your waterfront home and have to listen to a powerboat pass by. I really feel sorry for you and your outlook on life if that is how you feel. Its just too bad that the MP has to waste their time to placate the selfish needs of the few that do not know how to get along with others or enjoy their life without complaining. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Quote:
BTW it is called "Winnipesaukee Family Alliance for Boating Safety" (WinnFABS).
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,667
Thanks: 3,282
Thanked 1,132 Times in 814 Posts
|
Whatever happen to WinnFIBS? They may be dormant but my state representative received a phone call from someone who claim he is WinnFIBS. The person was canvassing the possibility to limit the size of boats and motors under the technicality that Lake Winnipesaukee is a reservoir. All surrounding towns get their water from the lake. Due to the tourist based economy my representative don't think it is feasible to legislate.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Winnisquam
Posts: 408
Thanks: 72
Thanked 115 Times in 73 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Winnisquamer For This Useful Post: | ||
pm203 (09-19-2015) | ||
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|