Baldis- A Lot of Nerve

[donnamatrix]

My understanding is that Lloyd's of London, the insurer of the burned out building, is declining to pay insurance because either the owners or the representative of the owners indicated to Lloyd's that the building had a sprinkler system or other supression system in place, when in reality, there was no system in place. Consequently, with the Baldi vs. Lloyds suit and the Lloyd's vs. Baldi suit - the building itself is evidence that must be left in place until the legal wrangling is finished. I could be wrong, but that's how I hear it from folks in the insurance business.

[no-engine]

Originally Posted by donnamatrix

My understanding is that Lloyd's of London, the insurer of the burned out building, is declining to pay insurance because either the owners or the representative of the owners indicated to Lloyd's that the building had a sprinkler system or other supression system in place, when in reality, there was no system in place. Consequently, with the Baldi vs. Lloyds suit and the Lloyd's vs. Baldi suit - the building itself is evidence that must be left in place until the legal wrangling is finished. I could be wrong, but that's how I hear it from folks in the insurance business.

Pretty much what I have read in the media.... With addition that Fire Marshal's investigation is still on-going.

And I also observe that each Baldi denies knowledge of the others dealings, saying different owner. WE do read that Pat owns drive in, that daughter in law owns saloon, another Baldi or even Brandi also owns water slide or the son. There has to be some communication!

One poster said he worked one summer for the late Larry, and tells of the cash being handled during bike week! Imagine this year the revenue to the saloon: Busby's staging site, advertising banners on the fences, the vendor spaces on property!!!
Same sort of rental revenue on drive in and water slide property!

[jrc]

OMG family members owning nearby businesses.

OMG family members refusing to talk bad about their other member's business.

OMG cash changing hands on bike week

I don't these people from Adam but one of the ugly run down businesses near the Weirs burned. So now we have a burned ugly building instead of a plain ugly building. Does anyone really think the visitors to the Weirs are traumatized by this building. The place needs a good rebuild could it look much worse?

[Belmont Resident]

Originally Posted by jrc

OMG family members owning nearby businesses.

OMG family members refusing to talk bad about their other member's business.

OMG cash changing hands on bike week

I don't these people from Adam but one of the ugly run down businesses near the Weirs burned. So now we have a burned ugly building instead of a plain ugly building. Does anyone really think the visitors to the Weirs are traumatized by this building. The place needs a good rebuild could it look much worse?

Ya, do you think this dead horse has been beaten enough yet?

[dpg]

Originally Posted by Belmont Resident

Ya, do you think this dead horse has been beaten enough yet?

haha - wonder how many visitors this week got a look at that building, turned around and went home. Everyone's so dramatic about "our beautiful lake is tarnished." Go for a drive and look around there's ugly-ness all around us every day. "your little piece of heaven" isn't exempt.

[Bear Island South]

Actually, this lawsuit has nothing to do with the burned building, it is over rights of access which the Baldi's clearly have.
You can go on and on about the burned building and I think there is another thread for that, but this case is about access and the deed language is clear.

[LIforrelaxin]

Originally Posted by Bear Island South

Actually, this lawsuit has nothing to do with the burned building, it is over rights of access which the Baldi's clearly have.
You can go on and on about the burned building and I think there is another thread for that, but this case is about access and the deed language is clear.

While I agree the lawsuit is over something that is spelled out in the deed, which expressly states that there is a right of way through the thurstons property. I can't help but believe Thurston's is refusing to open the gate because of the Wild Open Saloon issue. I think these things are very linked...

However Baldi does have a legal right to use the access....And Thurston in the end will loose...

[Sunbeam lodge]

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin

While I agree the lawsuit is over something that is spelled out in the deed, which expressly states that there is a right of way through the thurstons property. I can't help but believe Thurston's is refusing to open the gate because of the Wild Open Saloon issue. I think these things are very linked...

However Baldi does have a legal right to use the access....And Thurston in the end will loose...

As I read it the baldis have access through the property but it does not say the general public and vendors can pass through and park and pay baldis

[LIforrelaxin]

Originally Posted by Sunbeam lodge

As I read it the baldis have access through the property but it does not say the general public and vendors can pass through and park and pay baldis

What is says is that in the event that the City of Laconia, requires there to be a secondary point of access it can be used to pass and re-pass for access.... The wording is loose, but I believe would allow for Vendors or even the public. But even more importantly for the town, during a event like bike week, it is a secondary emergency access...

In Short I don't think this would be at this point, if the Town hadn't order that the access be opened. Unfortunately Thurston's holds the Key......

[Belmont Resident]

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin

What is says is that in the event that the City of Laconia, requires there to be a secondary point of access it can be used to pass and re-pass for access.... The wording is loose, but I believe would allow for Vendors or even the public. But even more importantly for the town, during a event like bike week, it is a secondary emergency access...

In Short I don't think this would be at this point, if the Town hadn't order that the access be opened. Unfortunately Thurston's holds the Key......

States it is ONLY for the purpose of emergency access to the vendor area.
There is a picture of it clearly marked as such in the paper.

[LIforrelaxin]

Originally Posted by Belmont Resident

States it is ONLY for the purpose of emergency access to the vendor area.
There is a picture of it clearly marked as such in the paper.

That is what I had figured...

[BroadHopper]

I'm surprised the fire dept do not hold a key. I do know they have keys to other emergancy gates throughout the city.