Repealing Shoreline Protection maybe?

hemlock · 12-07-2010, 06:48 AM

As it happens I was considering the two 2007 bills which went into effect in July 2008. HB 383 added the language that the rules were developed from and HB 663 added the permitting and funding mechanism.

"269:5 Positions Established. The department of environmental services may hire up to 6 additional staff positions to implement RSA 483-B and to perform education and outreach. Authorized positions include, at a minimum, 2 environmentalist II and 2 environmental III positions for implementation of RSA 483-B, and one environmentalist II position for education and outreach. Funding for the positions and associated costs shall be drawn from the wetlands and shorelands review fund under RSA 482-A:3, III."

Personally I believe that the methodology of funding the regulators by their regulatory fees creates an incentive for more bureacracy and is bad legislative policy.What is your opinion?

tis · 12-07-2010, 09:08 AM

I have to agree with the last three posts. We have recently been through the process a couple of times and I don't think it is easy or timely. We hired people to get us through it, I would never have tackled it on our own. I think the whole process took longer, costs more, and didn't change anything for the better than what we would have done.

bilproject · 12-07-2010, 11:44 AM

Looks like your new house is coming along nicely. Seems to be a contractor that actually puts some manpower on the job. Missing those cams to check ice conditions to get out to Bear this winter. I too have found the new regs to be easy to manuver through and DES is more than helpful.

12-07-2010, 06:48 AM	#1
hemlock Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 67 Thanks: 1 Thanked 43 Times in 20 Posts	shoreland As it happens I was considering the two 2007 bills which went into effect in July 2008. HB 383 added the language that the rules were developed from and HB 663 added the permitting and funding mechanism. "269:5 Positions Established. The department of environmental services may hire up to 6 additional staff positions to implement RSA 483-B and to perform education and outreach. Authorized positions include, at a minimum, 2 environmentalist II and 2 environmental III positions for implementation of RSA 483-B, and one environmentalist II position for education and outreach. Funding for the positions and associated costs shall be drawn from the wetlands and shorelands review fund under RSA 482-A:3, III." Personally I believe that the methodology of funding the regulators by their regulatory fees creates an incentive for more bureacracy and is bad legislative policy.What is your opinion?

12-07-2010, 11:44 AM	#3
bilproject Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bear Island/Fort Myers, Fla Posts: 231 Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 1 Thanked 59 Times in 41 Posts	How's the house coming P.I.G Looks like your new house is coming along nicely. Seems to be a contractor that actually puts some manpower on the job. Missing those cams to check ice conditions to get out to Bear this winter. I too have found the new regs to be easy to manuver through and DES is more than helpful.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-07-2010, 09:08 AM	#2
tis Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 6,946 Thanks: 795 Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,040 Posts	I have to agree with the last three posts. We have recently been through the process a couple of times and I don't think it is easy or timely. We hired people to get us through it, I would never have tackled it on our own. I think the whole process took longer, costs more, and didn't change anything for the better than what we would have done.