Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2010, 09:25 AM   #1
Argie's Wife
Senior Member
 
Argie's Wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton
Posts: 1,908
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 533
Thanked 579 Times in 260 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles View Post
AW,
It was a bit of a rant, sorry. I just came back from replacing a sign that was thrown into a creek on private property twice in the past two weeks. Signs are expensive for the candidates and volunteers like myself take time out of their schedules to try and make a difference by helping their candidates. I guess I just went off the deep end when I see folks complaining about signs.
I wasn't offended; I have a thicker skin than that. But thank you for your post. I've always liked reading you here on the forum and appreciate your views - even when we don't agree.

I've seen signs removed, thrown down, driven over, and defaced in the name of "politics"... not good sportsmanship if you ask me.
Argie's Wife is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Argie's Wife For This Useful Post:
Pineedles (09-22-2010)
Old 09-22-2010, 11:07 AM   #2
RI Swamp Yankee
Senior Member
 
RI Swamp Yankee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Kingstown RI
Posts: 688
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Since the state needs money here is a way to generate revenue (keep in mind I have read too may FLL posts )

The state (or towns) could collect all signs left up past the time allowed by law and "redeem" them, perhaps charging candidates $20 per square foot for the total footage "redeemed". Example, 100 signs collected, each 2 square feet equals 200 square feet times $20 equals $4,000 owed by the name on the sign. Maybe the "cost" would encourage them to remove them rather than paying to have them "redeemed".

__________________
Gene ~ aka "another RI Swamp Yankee"
RI Swamp Yankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 11:29 AM   #3
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RI Swamp Yankee View Post
Since the state needs money here is a way to generate revenue (keep in mind I have read too may FLL posts )

The state (or towns) could collect all signs left up past the time allowed by law and "redeem" them, perhaps charging candidates $20 per square foot for the total footage "redeemed". Example, 100 signs collected, each 2 square feet equals 200 square feet times $20 equals $4,000 owed by the name on the sign. Maybe the "cost" would encourage them to remove them rather than paying to have them "redeemed".

Imagine what damage someone could do by putting out signs with their enemies name on them
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 01:08 PM   #4
steadyon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Meredith
Posts: 102
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Hi all,
Here is another point of view.
I am a candidate. My friends, family have contributed their own hard earned $ so that I can purchase and display signs. I agree that too many are annoying and also that they should only be on private property isn't a bad idea either.
what bothers me is that someone is stealing my signs in the night. taking signs is not going to make a candidate loose.
it is a shame that this person has that kind of time on their hands. they could be doing something productive like picking up trash along the road or helping a neighbor.
thanks for listening
steadyon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steadyon For This Useful Post:
Rattlesnake Guy (09-22-2010)
Old 09-22-2010, 01:24 PM   #5
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

First of all are these little signs an effective campaign tool? I mean most just say the candidates name. Do people really go into the booth and say let's vote for him I saw his name on the corner? At least tell me what your number one issue is.

Second, they should use paper or other degradable materials for the signs. Those plastic ones fall into the brush and stay for a long time, at least paper would be dissolved into the ground by spring. The press should make this a "green" issue and shame the candidates into it, no need for a law.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-22-2010, 05:32 PM   #6
Seeker
Senior Member
 
Seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Effingham
Posts: 408
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I vote for chalkboards.

(Did I spell that right?)
Seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Seeker For This Useful Post:
Argie's Wife (09-22-2010)
Old 09-22-2010, 05:50 PM   #7
summersux
Member
 
summersux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steadyon View Post
it is a shame that this person has that kind of time on their hands. they could be doing something productive like picking up trash along the road
Yeah, I think thats what they are doing.
summersux is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to summersux For This Useful Post:
brk-lnt (09-22-2010), jeffatsquam (09-22-2010)
Old 09-22-2010, 08:50 PM   #8
Rattlesnake Guy
Senior Member
 
Rattlesnake Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
Default

My son worked for a campaign this summer and said it was kind of funny that the state would go around each day and pick up the signs that were put in the wrong places on the state roads. They would dump the pile in the same secret place each day and the campaigns would go and fetch the signs to repeat the process the next day.
Rattlesnake Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 09:27 AM   #9
Ropetow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rochester, NH / Bartlett, NH
Posts: 322
Thanks: 228
Thanked 33 Times in 13 Posts
Default sign scavanger

My home community removed the signs of defeated candidates placed on public property a few days to a week after the election. This is a bonanza for other local elected officials, as we can go to the home of the dead signs and pick their bones....the wire stakes signs sit on are not cheap and this is a way to save some $$$ for the next election while also practicing good recycling.
Ropetow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 12:49 PM   #10
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 349
Thanked 1,708 Times in 602 Posts
Default

There should be a modest fine for every day a political sign is left up after an election.Same for yard sales and other events.We backed a candidate last year for a local election and the very next day we drove around and picked them all up...........cleaned up the roads......and who knows....we might get to re-use them
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 01:17 PM   #11
Ropetow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rochester, NH / Bartlett, NH
Posts: 322
Thanks: 228
Thanked 33 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
There should be a modest fine for every day a political sign is left up after an election.Same for yard sales and other events.We backed a candidate last year for a local election and the very next day we drove around and picked them all up...........cleaned up the roads......and who knows....we might get to re-use them
That's what most candidates for local office tend to do. It seems most of the leftover signs we are still seeing are from statewide candidates who probably don't have a clue where the signs are.
Ropetow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 10:56 PM   #12
Greene's Basin Girl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 394
Thanked 527 Times in 269 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Ropetow;140393]That's what most candidates for local office tend to do. It seems most of the leftover signs we are still seeing are from statewide candidates who probably don't have a clue where the signs are.[/QUOTE The towns should charge the candidate if the signs are left up. After all the candidate wants everyone to put up his/hers signs all over the place. They are horrible to look at. People need to be responsible for their actions.
Greene's Basin Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 01:21 PM   #13
RailroadJoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Thanks: 259
Thanked 158 Times in 100 Posts
Default

My two cents.

We sportsman have a saying or two. One is "Carry out what you carry in" and two "Leave only footprints and take only photos".
Of course we have our "week-enders" that don't follow anything. I still find beer cans and coffee cups a mile or two in the woods, on and off trails.

All-in-all. If you can place the signs out why can't you take them in when its over. Same as the yard sale signs.
RailroadJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 01:50 PM   #14
gtxrider
Senior Member
 
gtxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 2
Thanked 46 Times in 24 Posts
Default Bad Losers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ropetow View Post
My home community removed the signs of defeated candidates placed on public property a few days to a week after the election. This is a bonanza for other local elected officials, as we can go to the home of the dead signs and pick their bones....the wire stakes signs sit on are not cheap and this is a way to save some $$$ for the next election while also practicing good recycling.
.

I don't know about the NH Primarys but it seems there are a few losers that won't accept defeat and continue to run so their signs can stay up but they would need to change the party.

I saw signs on docks and boat houses cruising the lake this past week. Who takes those signs down?
gtxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 07:35 PM   #15
jeffatsquam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: moultonborough/sandwich
Posts: 187
Thanks: 173
Thanked 77 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtxrider View Post
.

I don't know about the NH Primarys but it seems there are a few losers that won't accept defeat and continue to run so their signs can stay up but they would need to change the party.

I saw signs on docks and boat houses cruising the lake this past week. Who takes those signs down?
You can only hope the slobs that put them up
jeffatsquam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.10999 seconds