Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2010, 07:24 AM   #1
lawn psycho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On the move...
Posts: 987
Thanks: 113
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Default

Dbreskin, if you are overtaken by a boat that is going on plane and it's throwing a wake, if you slow down to headway speed or stop your boat is going to get jostled more than if you maintain you course and speed. So that is an example of where I would use my judgement not let a rule dictate how to handle my boat.

If it was a really tight spot in between rocks or markers then I would slow down as it's better to rock the boat then hit something. And out of respect for property owners I'm probably more cautious about how close I am running at speed along the shore than anything else.

There, we've now argued the 150 ft rule for 2010. Now we need a Weir's Channel debate, couple threads to complain about traffic, then complain when the lake level gets too low and then wait for ice-in...
lawn psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2010, 07:49 AM   #2
topwater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Thumbs up

AHHHH, the sound of COMMON SENSE ! You have to love it, I wish more people had it !
topwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2010, 07:50 AM   #3
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default

I don't think this thread should be an argument regarding whether or not the 150' rule is necessary.

The 150' rule IS the law. The people that Just Sold was talking about were not following the law. Period. Debate that.
__________________
Getting ready for winter!
chipj29 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chipj29 For This Useful Post:
ApS (06-01-2010), JanN (05-24-2010), Resident 2B (05-24-2010)
Old 05-24-2010, 10:38 AM   #4
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,692
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 356
Thanked 646 Times in 294 Posts
Default

The recent passage of a rule that many consider stupid reduced the respect for others, such as the 150 rule. That's just the way it is. Bonehead rules make for bonehead boaters. The 150 rule makes boating more pleasant, but indeed, there are many situations where both captains agree to use common sense and cheat a bit. As for bass boats - they are some of the safest boaters on the lake, even at 60 mph.
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lakegeezer For This Useful Post:
Resident 2B (05-24-2010)
Old 05-24-2010, 11:30 AM   #5
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I think you will have to look long and hard for a collision involving a fisherman, bass boat or otherwise. Plenty of fisherman falling in and freezing to death but very few collisions.

I like the 150' rule, I can't judge the distance well enough to know if I ever really cheated, but I always try to give as much space as practical. I think the concept that you must stay a certain large distance away is important. New boaters don't understand that boats are not cars. They don't stop on a dime, there are no lanes and they affect neighboring boats even if they don't hit them.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jrc For This Useful Post:
Resident 2B (05-24-2010)
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.08961 seconds