Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2010, 09:11 AM   #1
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Congratulations are in order. That was some giant pat on your own back.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 10:08 AM   #2
jmen24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR View Post
Congratulations are in order. That was some giant pat on your own back.
But a proper public display of back patting is required to show that you are attempting to offset the carbon released while racing vehicles, that are tuned for performance, not efficiency.

Last edited by jmen24; 05-06-2010 at 03:07 PM.
jmen24 is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 10:20 AM   #3
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

It's not fair that you have six boats and some people have only one or even none. That's why the lake is overcrowded.

I'm suggesting a 1970's limit on boats. One boat for every lakefront property, two for islanders. Once these are counted we will subtract them from the actual number of boats on the lake in 1970. Then we will give permits to enough boats to reach those levels. Permits will be given out through a lottery system. It will only be coincidence that contributors to my election fund will get the lions share of the permits.

Gentrification is probably an overall benefit to lake water quality and lake crowding. Think about it and compare the effects of eight 1/4 acre cabins, each with a 1950's spetic system, and a small two stroke outboard, filled to capacity with renters 7 days a week, all summer long. Compared with one 2 acre site, a mcmansion with a 21st centrury septic system, two modern boats with 4 star emmissions, all only used a few weekends a year plus one week in July by a family of four.

Ok I'll give you green lawns work against the mcmansion.
jrc is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 12:54 PM   #4
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,945
Thanks: 795
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,040 Posts
Default

Pleazzzzzz, jrc,no more limits of anything by the government.
tis is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
RI Swamp Yankee (05-06-2010)
Old 05-06-2010, 03:22 PM   #5
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

You know I was joking right?

But I should be careful about what I say, there are people who will think it was a good idea.

I wasn't joking about mcmansions, in a lot cases razing a bunch of old places for fewer new places will be less damaging to the lake.
jrc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 05-07-2010, 05:51 AM   #6
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,028
Thanks: 2,285
Thanked 789 Times in 564 Posts
Red face OVERALL Benefit? Some Scattered Thoughts...

I'd be more concerned that NYSE closing prices for yesterday are to be "re-adjusted" after panic selling.

Oops...I forgot 10)...

10) An 800-watt water purifier throws off a lot of heat. I set a timer for 2-AM, so it warms up the cottage—early. (One—sometimes a pair—of purifiers, that is).

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc View Post
"...It's not fair that you have six boats and some people have only one or even none..."
I forgot— —make that seven. (But mostly only a pair are used at the same time).

Eight to include my brother-in-law's sailboat—the same BIL who installed roof solar panels himself, and whose meter turns backwards at nearly all times. (Keeping our energy prices down).

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmen24 View Post
But a proper public display of back patting is required to show that you are attempting to offset the carbon released while racing vehicles, that are tuned for performance, not efficiency.
Much of my road-racing career was instructing other drivers—of whom, most were in their own cars.

(In "Street-Survivor" driving schools, learning street driver proficiencies can save in the "energy-hogging" manufacture of replacement cars while avoiding unnecessary street crashes—and costly injuries).

However, I did take comfort in learning that SCCA auto racing caused less shrinking of our petroleum reserves than horse racing!

Last edited by ApS; 05-22-2010 at 10:17 AM. Reason: Removed off-topic "Gentrification" issue for a later time...
ApS is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.08766 seconds