![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton
Posts: 1,908
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 533
Thanked 579 Times in 260 Posts
|
Quote:
Be careful what you wish for with SB-2. I thought it was a good idea at first, too. I have no doubt that people are voting who have no idea what they're really voting for - they get confused by the wording of the articles. Warrant articles should NOT be difficult for the lay-person to understand. I'm with you about wind-bags at some of the meetings - I cringe when some people step up to the mic to speak... but that's part of the process... I also see some people come up with excellent points or questions. By the way - the same wind-bags will be at the Deliberative Session who were at the town meetings - that doesn't change at all. My problem with the Deliberative Session is that out of a town of 4,000+, we're lucky to have 40 voters show up for the event. The amount of apathy people have about voting is appalling... @Sue-Doe-Nym: Quote:
Remember - the money isn't being approved to be raised (set aside by tax payers per the voting outcomes) - only the final amount to be requested is being voted on at the Deliberative Session. The money isn't approved to be raised UNTIL voting day. The articles presented to the voters on voting day would be the ones that are on your absentee ballot. I think you're confusing the approval of the funds to be raised with the request for the amount of funds that is being discussed at the Deliberative Session. Example - the Fire Dept. wants a new engine and is asking voters to approve $600,000. At the Deliberative Session in February, Joe Voter amends the request (Warrant article) to say $400,000 and Jane Voter seconds the amendment. The voters present at the Deliberative session are polled by the moderator and counted by the Keepers of the Checklist to approve the amendment. For the sake of this example, let's say that the amendment passes by a favorable vote. So, when the voters meet AGAIN in March, they will then vote to raise the $400,000 or not, based on the changes from the Deliberative Session that Joe Voter made and those present agreed on... See, they didn't actually say they were going to set the money aside at the Deliberative Session - they only amended the article to be different than what was presented. One of the "bonuses" about SB-2 is that when things are amended - whether it's wording or dollar amounts - the time between the Deliberative Session and the actual voting of the articles later is supposed to give people time to review the changes, write editorials and newspaper articles, etc. about the proposed Warrants, and for the printing of the absentee ballots. Hope that makes sense. Maybe talking with your town clerk will help shed light on the issue for you, too. I've found town clerks to be great resources... Last edited by Argie's Wife; 01-07-2010 at 11:10 AM. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|