![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 765
Thanks: 4
Thanked 260 Times in 172 Posts
|
Hazlenut said: "We can never know for sure what Ward was actually thinking or feeling and we will never know 100% how the woman was behaving at the time."
He's right, of course. But neither could the jury know, for sure. Wouldn't that uncertainty have constituted "reasonable doubt," preventing a conviction? Should Ward be released? - yes, we think so. Was he an "unintended consequence" of a perhaps poorly crafted law? - yes, we think so. Did the case get out of hand, driven by personalities? - yes, we think so. Can we really resolve the case on this forum, knowing less than what presumably the jury knew? - probably not. |
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DickR For This Useful Post: | ||
MarkinNH (11-30-2010) | ||
| Bookmarks |
|
|