![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,028
Thanks: 2,285
Thanked 789 Times in 564 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
What likely happened is that Thompson was traveling faster—perhaps "way" much faster—than Howard, and struck her car from behind under conditions too fast for the allowed speed. (In agreement with FLL). Under "rear-ender" conditions, it's possible to lose control even at slow speeds, but it's conceivable that the impact threw Howard from the driver's position. Adding: Without seatbelts, it's not easy to steer from the passenger footwell. ![]() In automobile racing, this can be used to a racer's advantage. It's seen often-enough in NASCAR, but "punting another car into the bushes" is frowned upon in road racing. "Punting" accelerates the leading car (the "puntee") into loss of control. The advantage goes to the "punter", whose car is automatically slowed adequately to make the corner. Recently in Formula 1, a team manager advised a driver to "take out" another driver using this technique— —over a radio monitored by race officials . Very "ungentlemanly", but automobile racing championships—worth million$—have been won in this way. Of course, the State is too cheap to pay for an expert with knowledge of the dynamics of auto crashes but Attorney Moir needs only to shake out one "expert" who can tell the best story for the defense. "The Truth" in our legal system does not appear "in the middle"—some have been fooled into that belief. Our system was designed for profit.
|
||
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|