|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-23-2015, 06:21 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 84
Thanks: 35
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Alton Tries to Silence its Citizens
From the Union Leader, gotta think this will backfire on Alton Selectmen for sure.
Quote:
|
|
02-23-2015, 06:47 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: White Salmon, WA
Posts: 294
Thanks: 21
Thanked 168 Times in 91 Posts
|
Wow.....the underbelly of living in a small town, eh? I might remind the selectmen that lots of blood has been shed in our history protecting citizens rights to criticize the government. If they're going to run for office they need to have thick skin and take the criticism. It's not always pleasant, but as American citizens we do have the right to voice our opinion.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dickiej For This Useful Post: | ||
02-23-2015, 07:35 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
The selectmen didn't have the citizen arrested, they asked the police chief to remove him. The citizen was told by the chief many times to stop talking and leave the room. The citizen refused to leave and kept talking. The chief had no choice but to arrest him. He would not have been arrested if he would have followed the chiefs instructions.
Why do some citizens have to harass public servants with comments like that gentleman made? I know, free speech...but gee whiz.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rusty For This Useful Post: | ||
02-23-2015, 08:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,221
Thanks: 299
Thanked 798 Times in 367 Posts
|
And it's incidents like this that result in fewer and fewer people choosing to volunteer to fill these roles.
Most town offices, including Selectmen, now have only one candidate who therefore wins by default. Many seem to forget that the majority of these roles in small towns are unpaid, volunteer positions, not ones that are typically filled by "career politicians". |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Merrymeeting For This Useful Post: | ||
02-23-2015, 08:37 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,882
Thanks: 466
Thanked 674 Times in 373 Posts
|
If they can't handle public criticism they should not be in public office, the selectmen should have given him his 5 minutes, he probably would have gone home satisfied, the selectmen would have forgotten about it in about 10 minutes and it would have been over. Instead, they need to exert their authority and make mountain out of molehill. The town will end up paying for this, it should in my opinion.
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ITD For This Useful Post: | ||
CaptT820 (03-05-2015), chattypatty (02-25-2015), Grandpa Redneck (02-24-2015), granitebox (02-24-2015), laketrout (05-17-2015), Marauder (03-01-2015), Ms Molly McKever (02-23-2015), Natt (02-24-2015), Resident 2B (02-25-2015), secondcurve (02-24-2015), tis (02-24-2015) |
Sponsored Links |
|
02-23-2015, 08:57 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,221
Thanks: 299
Thanked 798 Times in 367 Posts
|
Quote:
At some point it stops being free speech and just becomes obnoxious. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Merrymeeting For This Useful Post: | ||
02-23-2015, 09:35 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 478
Thanks: 3
Thanked 207 Times in 110 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't know how it works in Alton, but generally when citizens at a Selectmen's meeting get a chance to address the board, the rules are that they have a set time and that whatever is said stays within the bounds of decorum. There are no Roberts Rules involved - no one is making a motion or taking a vote. Based on what was contained in the editorial, it doesn't sound like any rules were broken, just some thin-skinned public officials got their feathers ruffled and overreacted. |
|
02-23-2015, 10:21 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,953
Thanks: 80
Thanked 971 Times in 433 Posts
|
The 1st Amendment to the Constitution is not up for debate...
If the meeting rules of the Alton Selectmen are such that John Q. Public gets 5 minutes to speak.... then the Selectmen have to abide by those rules. They are Public Servants and as such public scrutiny & criticism is part of the job. Too bad if they didn't like what he had to say... I say we should be happy for the people like Mr. Clay who go to these meetings and voice their opinion. Too many people nowadays just don't care.... Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (02-24-2015), CaptT820 (03-05-2015), Grandpa Redneck (02-24-2015), granitebox (02-24-2015), Jersey Ed (02-24-2015), Marauder (03-01-2015), Resident 2B (02-25-2015), riverat (02-26-2015), SAMIAM (02-26-2015), tis (02-24-2015), wynndog (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 06:35 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,087
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 557 Times in 286 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2015, 07:30 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,221
Thanks: 299
Thanked 798 Times in 367 Posts
|
Quote:
The impression I was left with after reading about this is that the citizen WAS given his 5 minutes, and then refused to stop when his time was up. I stand corrected and agree he should have been given his time. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Merrymeeting For This Useful Post: | ||
secondcurve (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 08:16 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Below is the Board Policy Public Participation at Meetings
Question: Did the citizen break any of the rules in paragraph 3 ? TOWN OF ALTON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT BOARD MEETINGS The primary purpose of the Board of Selectmen’s meetings is to conduct the business of the Town. The Board encourages residents to attend Board meetings so that they may become acquainted with the operation and programs of the Town. All official meetings of the Board shall be open to the press and the public. However, the Board reserves the right to meet and to adjourn or recess a meeting at any time. The Board also reserves the right to enter non-public session at any time, in accordance with the provisions of RSA 91-A:3. Public participation in the Board’s regular meetings is a privilege that the Board has adopted in order to assure that persons who wish to appear before the Board and bring matters to its attention may be heard. At the same time, in order to assure that it may conduct its meetings properly and efficiently, the Board adopts as policy the following procedures and rules pertaining to public participation at Board meetings: 1. At regularly scheduled Board meetings, the agenda will reflect two (2) times during the meeting that allows for public input. Speakers will be allotted five (5) minutes per person unless extended by approval of the Board. 2. Complaints regarding individual employees, other individuals and/or any matter that may, in the opinion of the Board infringe on another persons rights of privacy will not be allowed, such matters must be directed to the Town Administrator during normal business hours at Town Hall. 3. When addressing the Board, all speakers are to conduct themselves in a civil manner. Obscene, libelous, defamatory or violent statements will be considered out of order and will not be tolerated. The Board Chair may terminate the speaker’s privilege to address the Board if the speaker does not follow these rules of order. 4. If a speaker does not follow these rules after being warned to do so by the Board Chair they may be removed from the meeting. Persistent violations of these rules may result in loss of the privilege to address the Board. Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide the Board with an opportunity to receive directly from citizens any concerns, desires, or hopes they may have for the community. Procedure: A. Persons wishing to be heard must state their name(s), and address and state the issue(s) they wish to be heard on. B. Persons should try to speak directly to the issue, as briefly—and fully—as possible. C. Persons should try to be specific about what they want acted upon -–if that is the case—by the Board. Ground Rules: A. The Chairman of the Board conducts public input. B. The Chairman indicates how much time will be allowed for public input. C. The Chairman will call on those wishing to be heard. D. No discussion on individual personalities (good or bad) is permissible in public session. E.The Board will make no decisions during Public Input. F. Any person whose conduct is disruptive or disorderly will be ordered to cease and desist from such behavior. Should their behavior continue after due warning, they will be removed from the meeting room. Adopted this 14th day of January, 2015, by the Alton Board of Selectmen R. Loring Carr, Chairman Marc DeCoff, Vice Chairman Cydney Johnson, Selectman Lou LaCourse, Selectman David Hussey, Selectman
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rusty For This Useful Post: | ||
DRH (02-24-2015), upthesaukee (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 08:47 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,559
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,414
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,064 Posts
|
From the Union Leader:
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!! |
The Following User Says Thank You to upthesaukee For This Useful Post: | ||
Rusty (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 09:47 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
|
If someone is critical of a selectman in a town meeting, does that make it ok for the selectman to have that person arrested? No way - Jose!
Something like this also recently happened in Gilford, and it actually went to a trial court where the judge said something like "while the defendant may have been rude, he was not breaking any laws, and people do have the right of free expression.....up to an un-determined point." After what happened in Gilford, I betcha the local Town of Alton prosecutor decides to drop it as not acceptable for prosecution...and respectfully suggests for the selectman to get a grip on himself and what happens at town meetings, and go saw up some firewood for an hour or so to just get over his (the selectman) being disrespected.
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake! |
02-24-2015, 10:25 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,528
Thanks: 3,136
Thanked 1,091 Times in 785 Posts
|
Town of Gilford
I think they had a similar incident when a concerned citizen was arrested by the selectmen last year. Higher court overturn the lower court decision. It was a costly battle.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
02-24-2015, 11:08 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Quote:
Watching the video, IMO the citizen made some defamatory remarks against the selectmen. Definition of defamatory: (of remarks, writing, etc.) damaging the good reputation of someone.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rusty For This Useful Post: | ||
VitaBene (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 11:54 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
|
I see a very expensive lawsuit coming. There is absolutely nothing in what he said that was defamatory. They closed down public input, arrested him, and opened public input after he was escorted out of the room. This video shows it all.
|
02-24-2015, 12:02 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,528
Thanks: 748
Thanked 345 Times in 258 Posts
|
my only two cents on this topic
the town police are more in trouble, the selectman have a right to request the police chiefs presence to regulate the person if warranted. Police chief did not have probable cause to request him to stop talking nor probable cause to arrest him
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
02-24-2015, 01:04 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 885 Times in 518 Posts
|
Did the man get charged with anything? Or did the Police chief simply take him into custody to remove him?
The board of selectman have the right to ask somebody to leave or have them removed, if that person is interjecting themselves in a disruptive way. I actually have no problem with what seems to have happened, as long as the person wasn't charged with anything... This person has a track record of disrupting meetings, has been warned time and time again, and was finally dealt with in a way, that will hopefully teach him a lesson. If he hasn't been charged with anything then there is no "further cost".... he was given a chance to speak, he was rude and orderly, and was removed... I know that some liberal feel good atty. will argue that his basic rights where violated... But where they really???? He brought a timer... come one really??? get the guy some help he probably needs it.... he was purposely trying to bring this on himself... end of story.....
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island..... Last edited by LIforrelaxin; 02-24-2015 at 04:57 PM. Reason: spelling and gramer |
The Following User Says Thank You to LIforrelaxin For This Useful Post: | ||
DRH (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 01:55 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wolfeboro NH
Posts: 283
Thanks: 143
Thanked 121 Times in 76 Posts
|
Oxymorons
Although this is not the main topic of this thread, there are several references to the term "libelous..statements" including paragraph 3 of the Alton public participation rules. It is impossible to be libelous while speaking, since by definition libel is written, not spoken. A spoken falsehood would be called slander.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DBreskin For This Useful Post: | ||
Rusty (02-24-2015) |
02-24-2015, 02:32 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
|
Google the guy arrested. Jeffrey T. Clay. He seems to have a history of this stuff.
|
02-24-2015, 03:33 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
|
.....duh....oopsie-doopsie.....say.....maybe I'm just not the britest bulb on the tree???
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake! |
02-24-2015, 04:21 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,479
Thanks: 728
Thanked 1,398 Times in 969 Posts
|
Obviously he has a beef. I wonder what it is. He should have said something about that rather than just repeating that they should resign. It made him look rather ridiculous.
|
02-24-2015, 07:08 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,087
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 557 Times in 286 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2015, 07:31 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 62
Thanked 710 Times in 463 Posts
|
Quote:
Sometimes you have to just count to 100 (10,000?) and play the long game. Given more time, he may have acted in a way more within the definition. I suspect he will become more trouble for the board than they could ever have imagined. |
|
02-24-2015, 07:38 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Suncook, NH, but at The Lake at Heart
Posts: 2,612
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 433 Times in 209 Posts
|
I think that the Selectmen should have let him ramble on for his 5 minutes and let it go at that.
I lived in Atkinson, NH in the 90's and worked for the town as a camera person recording the Selectman's meetings. We had a long time resident who would make their rather odd statements/suggestions to the Selectmen that normally had nothing to do with the actual meeting or the current agenda pretty regularly. They were allowed to do this and would even be thanked by the Selectmen and then they would continue with their meeting. The resident would then be quiet for the rest of the meeting. I think the way Atkinson handled its resident is what the Alton Selectmen should have done.
__________________
Just Sold At the lake the stress of daily life just melts away. Pro Re Nata |
02-24-2015, 08:21 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
I think the selection were facing a person who was clearly testing the system. There was a clear history of no love between the selection and this guy. It was if they were ready to trap this guy, the closest selection to the door went for help before the guy really started his talk. The guy wasn't even yelling in a tantrum. He was level headed the entire time. A simple resolution would be to have just give him his 5 minutes and go after him after reviewing the video with a attorney. Their actions regardless of the person being a nuisance to them or a true American expressing his right to speak should not have been stopped based on what I heard. The Police chief could have caused an explosive situation with someone who could have been violent. There was no need for his involvement. Cell phone calling for assistance???? How about a radio. Did he even have any protection if this guy turned out to have a weapon????? This is the stuff stuff where you see people go postal. I am sad for the people of Alton. I did not hear anything offensive from him; I hear similar remarks about our current federal leaders and see nobody being arrested for it. What is different here than everywhere else.
|
02-25-2015, 06:09 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,296
Thanks: 67
Thanked 166 Times in 126 Posts
|
As I understand it, "Libel" is expressing something as fact, which is damaging to a reputation when the speaker knows it is a false statement.
A period of 'commentary' infers that facts and opinions may be expressed. It can be hard to tell the difference sometimes which is why libel and slander can be hard to prove. That's all I think I know about that, |
02-25-2015, 08:02 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Nashua/Winnisquam
Posts: 282
Thanks: 106
Thanked 96 Times in 49 Posts
|
Paragraph 3
"3. When addressing the Board, all speakers are to conduct themselves in a civil manner. Obscene, libelous, defamatory or violent statements will be considered out of order and will not be tolerated. The Board Chair may terminate the speaker’s privilege to address the Board if the speaker does not follow these rules of order."
These rules seem to have been re-written this year. I don't know if that was in there before or not, but it's almost like they had this guy in mind when they wrote them. |
02-25-2015, 08:17 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,479
Thanks: 728
Thanked 1,398 Times in 969 Posts
|
I wouldn't consider asking someone to resign or even telling them they should resign any of those things would you?
|
02-25-2015, 08:26 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
|
Claiming police injured him now.
Quote:
In an effort to squelch my free speech rights whereby I attempt to hold the BOS accountable during public input time at BOS meetings for their willful violations of the peoples' rights, the BOS stopped airing public meetings on public TV, instituted a policy regarding pubic input (where none existed prior) limiting public input to five minutes and which dis-allows so called “personal attacks.” Now he claims that he was hurt during the arrest. ALTON — Right to Know advocate Jeffrey Clay said Monday that Alton Police Chief Ryan Heath physically hurt him when he was arrested for disorderly conduct at a board of selectmen's meeting on Feb. 3. Alton's Chief of Police threw my left arm up behind my back, causing severe pain,” Clay said. |
|
02-25-2015, 08:33 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Quote:
That's the way I understand it. The selectboard revised the policy and stopped showing live televised meetings. This aggravated Clay and now he wants them to pack their bags and go to...wherever?? Here is an article that is in the fosters this morning: Clay claims he was hurt when arrested by police chief Wednesday, February 25, 2015 ALTON — Right to Know advocate Jeffrey Clay said Monday that Alton Police Chief Ryan Heath physically hurt him when he was arrested for disorderly conduct at a board of selectmen's meeting on Feb. 3. Clay, who has sued the Dover School Board for allegedly violating New Hampshire's laws about public meetings, was arrested by Heath after he asked members of Alton's board of selectmen to resign, during a public forum at their meeting, earlier this month. The entire incident was captured by a local cable access television channel and posted on fosters.com. It shows that Clay sat down before the board, during the public forum, and said, “Every time I show up here, it is my most fervent hope that I am going to find that you folks have resigned. But you continue to show an unwillingness to step up to the plate and take responsibility for your poor actions as selectmen and resign. I am asking you to do that now.” One of the board members said, “This is character assassination.” Board Chair R. Loring Carr asked for two points of order as Clay continued to talk about the selectmen's actions. Carr asked his fellow board members if they felt Clay's statements were libelous and inflammatory. Less than two minutes into Clay's statements, the board voted in favor of closing down their public forum because of the comments. That did not stop Clay from speaking. He remained in his chair and started reading definitions of integrity, honesty and character. That is when Carr told Clay, “You are done.” Heath, who was in the audience, was asked to address the issue. He moved a set of chairs next to where Clay was sitting and approached him. “You want to take your hands off me, please?” Clay asked Heath. When Heath did not back away, Clay said again, “Take your hands off me, please.” Heath told Clay that he had been asked to leave. Clay asked Heath if he was under arrest. Heath replied that he would be if Clay did not comply with his orders. Clay again started to speak. Heath reached into his pocket, pulled out a cell phone and called for police back up. After Clay finished reciting the definition of audacity, which means boldness or daring, especially with confident or arrogant disregard for personal safety, conventional thought, or other restrictions, Carr warned Clay for a third time. Heath placed Clay under arrest. As he did, he pulled on Clay's left arm and led him from the room with that arm behind his back. That is when Clay says he was physically injured. “Alton's Chief of Police threw my left arm up behind my back, causing severe pain,” Clay said in a letter sent to Foster's editors on Monday. Clay said in the letter that he takes no pride in being arrested, but he takes “great pride” in the First Amendment and freedom of speech, and in citizens' duties to “hold public officials accountable when they violate laws and people's trust.” “This is exactly what I was doing when I was arrested,” Clay said. Lt. Todd MacDougall of the Alton Police Department said Tuesday that Clay was charged with two Class B misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct. These charges carry a fine as their maximum penalty. Clay vowed to fight the charges against him.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
02-23-2015, 08:39 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
|
If a citizen is given five minutes to speak, short of emitting vulgar language, the citizen has the right to speak his mind. Nobody, including the police, has the right to determine or punish what he says. I seem to remember a similar scene in Gilford.
I put up with more than five continuous minutes of unpleasant criticism at work most every day... no one gets arrested. |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to wifi For This Useful Post: | ||
chattypatty (02-25-2015), Grandpa Redneck (02-24-2015), granitebox (02-24-2015), LakeSnake (02-24-2015), Marauder (03-01-2015), riverat (02-26-2015), secondcurve (02-24-2015), tis (02-24-2015) |
02-23-2015, 08:44 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,341
Thanks: 62
Thanked 239 Times in 162 Posts
|
I hope the guy who was arrested has the sense to talk to a lawyer about this.
*I smell a lawsuit* |
02-25-2015, 09:04 AM | #35 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rock Haven Lake - West Newfield, ME
Posts: 5,361
Thanks: 374
Thanked 1,044 Times in 490 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
02-25-2015, 09:58 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
"Clay stands by his statements, and has hired Sisti, who represented Pamela Smart in 1991 and several months ago successfully defended Gilford parent Billy Baer, winning his case against the Gilford police department after Baer was arrested for protesting a Gilford school’s choice of reading assignments for his daughter.A judge found Baer’s conduct was “impolite but not criminal.” Clay says his case will have a similar outcome."
Here is the article: Sisti
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
03-08-2015, 02:17 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 84
Thanks: 35
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
The Selectmen could have waited 5 minutes, the Chair could have directed that, and his time would have expired, end of story. Instead they caused to elevate it to what I guess will be a law suit and more money to pay Alton's attorney and then pay out yet another settlement. Not the sharpest knives in the drawer. The citizens of Alton do have the right to both attend, and address, the Selectmen during meetings. I also believe, as do many, that the Selectmen over use, and miss use the option of going in "private session" to conduct public business. The Right to Know Laws are in place for good reason and if allowed to circumvent those rules it seems that is what some Selectmen would prefer. |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lagoon For This Useful Post: | ||
03-08-2015, 05:07 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Quote:
Below is what I get out of the video that Clay said that the selectmen thought were defamatory statements: 1. Poor decisions and actions for selectmen and resign. 2. Continued violations of citizens rights and resign. Between the remarks Clay made about the selectmen he kept saying for selectmen to step-up and resign. Then 1 minute and 35 sec’s into Clay’s presentation the chair made a motion to shut down public discussion because of defamatory statements made by Clay. Clay continued to talk and the chair gave him 3 warnings to stop. When Clay didn’t stop, the chair asked the chief to remove him. Clay refused to move after the chief asked him many times, so he was then escorted out of the room and arrested. Now the court/s will have to decide whether “poor decisions” and "violations of citizens rights” is defamatory and whether the chief was wrong in arresting him.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. Last edited by Rusty; 03-08-2015 at 07:59 PM. |
|
02-25-2015, 10:57 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
I appreciate Clay's defense of the First Amendment--where I teach, we are seeing an issue with transparency in local government which might destroy the opportunity for a new school--but I also believe there needs to be a system to keep extremists (inexact word choice, but you get it) in check.
|
02-25-2015, 11:08 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,341
Thanks: 62
Thanked 239 Times in 162 Posts
|
Politicians must be thick skinned.
One price they pay for the "power" which their political position affords them is the necessity to listen to the concerns and grievances of their constituents, who are given very wide latitude when airing them, due to "Freedom of Speech." The concern of course is: when you act to abridge or curtail free speech, where do you draw the line? |
02-25-2015, 12:30 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melrose, Mass.
Posts: 189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 183 Times in 52 Posts
|
Alton Tries to Silence its Citizens
I thought this only happened in Mass.
As a Public Servant for the City of Beverly MA I have been using Armor All on my skin for years. You do receive your fair share of abuse from the constituents it goes with the job. |
02-26-2015, 07:51 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Now the fun begins!
Clay to file civil suit against Alton officials after his arrest
ALTON — Right to Know advocate Jeffrey Clay plans to file a civil law suit against the town of Alton’s police department and the Board of Selectmen, after he was arrested for disorderly conduct, during a public forum, Feb. 3. Clay said on Wednesday that the board had the chief of police, or one of his officers, sitting behind him during three board meetings before his arrest date. Clay said he was informed that the board was trying to intimidate him, and make him fearful of speaking his mind. Clay has recently been calling for all of the board’s members to resign, claiming that they have been violating the state’s Right to Know laws. “I have repeatedly spoken to the board, regarding this issue, over the past several months in an attempt to resolve the issues without having to take them to court. Their response to my concerns, however, was silence. No discussion. No taking responsibility for their actions,” Clay said. Clay said instead of correcting their violations, board members continued to commit them. “That is why I asked them to resign,” Clay said. “My point was, if you are unwilling to follow the law, and respect the rights of the citizens, then they should resign.” Police Chief Ryan Heath, who arrested Clay, has a different view on the incidents leading up to his arrest. Heath said that Clay has a script that he is reading from when he approaches the board, during their meetings. As the script continues, Clay makes personal attacks on a family member of one of the people who sits on the board. “It is not relevant to any business being talked about,” Heath said. “He is reading from the same script about Right to Know laws, but it doesn’t specify any incident. He says, ‘You guys violated the Right to Know laws.’ Well then, when, and how?” Heath said Clay, who was removed from board meetings twice before his arrest on Feb. 3, approached the school board with the same accusations before waging his attacks on the board of selectmen. Heath said that, according to Clay, every public official in Alton violates the Right to Know laws. Heath said that the selectmen have adopted a series of rules for public participation, which prohibits defamatory statements, because of Clay’s scripted accusations. As for claims that he hurt Clay while putting him under arrest, Heath said Clay is “completely embellishing.” When removing Clay from the meeting room, he placed his left arm behind his back and walked behind him into an outside hallway, where he let Clay go until back up officers arrived. “It’s called the escort position,” Heath said. “That’s what they teach at the police academy. There was no pressure on his arm.” Clay said on Wednesday that his arm and shoulder are still sore, but he will not be seeking medical attention for the pain. He added that “psychologically, the entire process has been traumatizing.” Mark Sisti of Sisti Law Offices in Chichester said he will be representing Clay as he defends himself against the two Class B misdemeanor charges against him. Sisti is also expected to file the civil suit on Clay’s behalf. Sisti said what he saw in the video of Clay’s arrest was appalling. He intends to defend the charges against Clay by using the First Amendment, and his client’s right to free speech. Clay, who regularly contributes letters to the editor at Foster’s Daily Democrat, has also filed lawsuits against Dover’s school board, claiming a violation of the state’s laws regarding public meetings.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
02-26-2015, 08:21 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 329
Thanked 1,641 Times in 569 Posts
|
Shows the arrogance of many public officials. A better choice would have been to let him complete his statement, thank him for his contribution....even respond to points of disagreement and continue the meeting.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post: | ||
Charlie T (02-28-2015) |
02-26-2015, 08:45 AM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
|
Not surprised at all...any arrest would have resulted in injury, imo
Quote:
|
|
02-26-2015, 09:31 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 62
Thanked 710 Times in 463 Posts
|
Prior to my retirement I owned a business that had many "interesting" customers. There were frequent "interesting" interactions between my employees and the customers.
Inappropriate reactions on the part of my employees caused quite a few messes over the years. This caused me to preach the following: "Let's not be shocked by the things people do. Let's just consider what the APPROPRIATE RESPONSE should be." Whether it was somewhat planned or just fate, the board seems to have shot itself in the foot and given Clay the upper hand. |
02-26-2015, 11:59 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
I can't stand the title of this thread.
|
02-26-2015, 04:30 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 342
Thanks: 116
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
|
Live Free or Die
This thread somehow reminds of the Ward Bird incident.
I still see a sign or two on back roads saying, "Free Ward Bird." |
02-27-2015, 08:47 AM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 111
Thanked 259 Times in 107 Posts
|
Why
|
02-27-2015, 12:25 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
|
02-27-2015, 12:31 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 542
Thanks: 523
Thanked 313 Times in 154 Posts
|
If you want to see/watch biased, tune into the evening news on most any channel. IMO the title of this thread is accurate.
|
02-27-2015, 01:44 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 329
Thanked 1,641 Times in 569 Posts
|
Abuse of the system was not letting him speak.They were clearly waiting to jump on him the minute he got started.Ranting about resigning is really not slanderous and I think they won't do well in court.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post: | ||
nicole (03-01-2015) |
02-27-2015, 01:57 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Clay has been on a rampage for a few years now. Here is a good article written about him:
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 As I have read the numerous letters from Jeffrey T. Clay about facilities issues faced by the Newmarket School District, I have wondered why he is so concerned about a school system 35 miles and two counties away from where he lives in Alton. I couldn't imagine why he should be so interested in what happens in Newmarket. After all, since I live and pay taxes in Durham, I have considered the problem faced by Newmarket Junior/Senior High School to be none of my business. However, since some of Mr. Clay's recent commentary has thrown the Oyster River Cooperative School District into the public discussion, the situation is now the business of Oyster River taxpayers, of which I am one. Additionally, Mr. Clay has chosen to comment on the affairs of the Rochester and Barrington School Districts — two more districts in which he neither resides nor votes. Mr. Clay's frequent letters and (lately) community commentaries have attacked Newmarket school officials and other public figures with a vicious maze of charges, backed up by a baffling flood of information comprised of few facts, but a boatload of fiction. He is depending on the likelihood that readers will not have the time to track down the accuracy of his charges. He is probably correct to assume that most readers will have neither the time nor the energy to fact-check his numbers and dates and blustering conspiracy theories. So for me, the issue comes down to one crucial fact. The New Hampshire State Fire Marshall's Office has set a deadline for the Newmarket School District: the existing Newmarket Junior/Senior High School will not be allowed to open for the 2015 school year without substantial (and costly) renovation. That means that if Newmarket school officials put students in that building — as is — in September of 2015, they will be in violation of state law. The decision about whether to renovate, build a new school, or send students to another town's school is a decision for Newmarket voters to make. It is not up to Mr. Clay. So why, as a resident of Alton, does he care? As it turns out, Mr. Clay is a former Newmarket teacher, and he has an ax to grind. A simple Google search will turn up the public record regarding Mr. Clay's departure from Newmarket, along with his subsequent attempts to be reinstated. According to these public records, Mr. Clay was dismissed from his teaching position for multiple reasons. You can find online: 1) several newspaper articles regarding his situation; 2) rulings by the NH Public Employee Labor Relations Board upholding the dismissal and then confirming the PELRB's own decision, followed by; 3) the NH Supreme Court's upholding of the PELRB ruling. Mr. Clay has had his fifteen minutes of fame. Readers of his letters would do well to filter his invective — his wild, inaccurate charges and flat-out fantasies — through the lens of his grudge against the Newmarket School District, which, as affirmed by the PELRB and the NH Supreme Court, acted well within its rights to terminate Mr. Clay's employment. And, in the interest of disclosure, I was myself a teacher for 31 years, most of that time at the Oyster River Middle School, so I am familiar with the job requirements of teachers, teacher contracts, teachers' unions, and the responsibilities of school administrators. John Parsons Durham http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll...19831/0/SEARCH
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
02-27-2015, 04:25 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 885 Times in 518 Posts
|
I did a quick search on Jeffery T. Clay.... he has got a history... The clip in this thread would lead one to believe that the board acted to quickly.... However I think there is more to this story then anyone knows....
In short don't judge the Alton Board to quickly... Nor for that matter Jeffery Clay, and this situation.... What I can tell you from the clip however is that Jeffery Clay was asked repeatedly to stop, and stand down.. By both the Board of Selectmen, and by the police officer... They had the justification to remove him for not cooperating and that is the bottom line.... He didn't speak directly on any particular issue... Rather he had a general statement that the Board needs to resign.... This is the rule that applies: 2. Complaints regarding individual employees, other individuals and/or any matter that may, in the opinion of the Board infringe on another persons rights of privacy will not be allowed, such matters must be directed to the Town Administrator during normal business hours at Town Hall. The complaint was about each individual board member and their personal integrity....... Mr. Clay however knew that if he directed his comments at anyone individual this rule would clearly be evoked, so he instead direct his comments at the entire board to skirt this issue... My big question in this matter, is weather or not someone on the board and Mr. Clay have crossed paths, and that this is all a bit more personal then anyone knows.
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island..... |
02-27-2015, 05:42 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,882
Thanks: 466
Thanked 674 Times in 373 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-27-2015, 06:05 PM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Anchorage, Al
Posts: 141
Thanks: 56
Thanked 59 Times in 30 Posts
|
This Clay guy sounds like an idiot and got what he deserved.
|
02-27-2015, 06:13 PM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
|
02-27-2015, 08:53 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,144
Thanks: 203
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
In my opinion it doesn't matter how annoying this guy is or what his past is. This was a time of public comment. It is reasonable to have rules of order and IF he violated them, he could be asked to stop. It is unclear to me that he did violate the rules and even if he did bend them a bit it is not in the interests of a public board to come down on citizens so they should have given him broad leeway. Of course it is up to the board members to make the decision to cut him off and they did. Now they are paying the price for their lack of patience. Was it worth it? They shut him out of his 5 minutes and now the board is going to spend many hours in legal meetings and the town will bear the costs of the legal fight. Was this a winning plan? I'll bet the board members will be cursing their intolerance before too long.
The reason we should tolerate "free speech", even when presented by annoying individuals, is that EVERYONE who speaks in opposition to something strongly supported by someone else is going to be perceived as "annoying". Maybe next year the Alton board will do something that ticks off someone else. That person might rise to speak in opposition and probably become annoying in doing it. There is a time limit and rules to prevent extremely disorderly conduct. Those seem sufficient safeguards to prevent monopoly of the boards time. Let the fools have their few minutes. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post: | ||
christo1 (02-28-2015), DEJ (02-28-2015), riverat (03-01-2015), Seaplane Pilot (02-28-2015), secondcurve (02-27-2015), Tired of Waiting (02-28-2015), wifi (02-28-2015) |
02-27-2015, 09:36 PM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,087
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 557 Times in 286 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2015, 09:52 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 111
Thanked 259 Times in 107 Posts
|
Time to change NH License plate
And remove the "Live Free or Die" !!!
I cannot believe some of the posts in this thread where the poster is willing to take "Free Speech, Redress of Government and others" away from a person just because they are a nut job and a thorn in the sides of some. Here is a man who was RECOGNIZED by the board of selectmen to speak and as soon as he made a statement they, the Board, did not like they shut him down and cut his time off through "USE of FORCE." Are you kidding me!! And some of the posters on this board are OK with this? I live in a small town that has Selectmen and is run by town meetings. We also have folks who seem to be on the nutty side. But NEVER has the board shut them down for expressing their opinion even if calling for the board to resign. But yes we have had folks removed from select and town meeting for getting unruly. That is defined as using foul language, issuing threats, or refusing to end their talk when time has expired. I have read the town rules and watched the video and at NO time did the speaker violate the rules or the Constitution. The only violation I saw was the Selectmen violate the speakers right to free speech and redress of the Government. Every single citizen of the town should come to the defense of Mr. Clay, not because they agree with him and his positions but because if the board can shut him down they may be next. Do not take you rights lightly and defend those rights for every person regardless if you agree with them or not, but just because they are using your rights as well as theirs. If he looses his rights then you WILL loose yours. ToW |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tired of Waiting For This Useful Post: | ||
02-28-2015, 10:24 AM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
Quote:
The BOS took a legal and binding vote that accused Mr. Clay of using defamatory language against the board. Therefore it was not up to Mr. Clay to decide as to whether the board was right, or wrong. The chair made a motion and the board approved it. From that point on the board took the necessary action to have Clay removed and that did happen. We can all give our opinion as to whether Clay’s right to free speech was violated, but now it is going to be up to the court/s to decide what the outcome will be. So, all that being said, neither you nor I can say who has violated any laws, it will be up to the court/s to decide.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
|
02-28-2015, 10:39 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
|
He may have an argument with the BOS. But the game he is playing now involves a civil suit against a police officer that was doing his job. That's dirty pool as far as I'm concerned.
Should the civil suit against Alton's Police Chief and Police Department be embraced by the people of Alton as heroic in the fight for free speech? |
02-28-2015, 12:12 PM | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 111
Thanked 259 Times in 107 Posts
|
Defend His Rights
Quote:
True the Courts will say if his rights were violated or not. But do you want your rights whittled away by the courts? Because that is what can and is happening in this country. Only you and your fellow citizens can stand up and DEFEND your rights. When you stop defending your fellow citizens rights you loose yours as well. And it doesn't matter a tinkers damn if you agree with the other point of view or not. ToW |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tired of Waiting For This Useful Post: | ||
02-28-2015, 11:52 AM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 738
Thanks: 4
Thanked 256 Times in 168 Posts
|
I don't like getting into debates where perhaps both sides were wrong at least in part, but abuse of "free speech" in this case and others gets me. Nowhere in the constitution, when talking about a person's right to speak freely, does it say that others shall be forced to listen.
|
02-28-2015, 12:20 PM | #64 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 111
Thanked 259 Times in 107 Posts
|
They shut him up with force!!
Quote:
You are right!! No one needed to listen. But that is NOT what happened. They prevented him from speaking through the use of force. It's a lot different not to listen to a speaker and stopping them from speaking with force. I hope you can see the difference. ToW |
|
02-28-2015, 01:02 PM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 304
Thanks: 254
Thanked 180 Times in 85 Posts
|
The BOS didn't act smart
I personally think the BOS should have allowed his rant and when 5 min was up ask him to step away. If I was on the BOS I would have taken that 5 min to check email, step out for a bathroom visit, play solitaire on my phone or do anything other than listen to him. I doubt the rules state that anyone is forced to listen and pay attention during his time, he simply must be allowed to speak during his 5 min of fame.
If this guy was allowed his time he would have no recourse other than to sit down and shut up, he knew the rules and his legal rights long before he ever set foot in that room. If the BOS put any intelligent thought into it they could have avoided the unfortunate results, and the cost that is sure to result. CT |
02-28-2015, 11:57 AM | #66 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 111
Thanked 259 Times in 107 Posts
|
I covered it!
Quote:
From my post: "Here is a man who was RECOGNIZED by the board of selectmen to speak and as soon as he made a statement they, the Board, did not like they shut him down and cut his time off through "USE of FORCE." I watched the video and Mr, Clay did not in any way use defamatory language. "A defamatory statement is a false statement of fact that exposes a person to hatred, ridicule, or contempt, causes him to be shunned, or injures him in his business or trade." Show me where any statement had any of those results and I'll then agree. The selectmen voted to violate his rights because their feelings were being hurt. As for the part of the law suite against the police any lawyer is going to name all involved with the action. The complaint against the officer is for pain and suffering as stated for his arm being bent up behind his back. Don't know if he was really hurt or not but the court will decide that. ToW |
|
02-28-2015, 06:28 AM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
I'm not sure if you misunderstood whom I was referring to as an ambulance chaser, but in either case there would be no reputation to be hurt and, therefore, not defamation.
However, if that was a subtle joke, bravo--subtlety is so rare these days, I assume it doesn't exist online. |
02-28-2015, 07:39 AM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,479
Thanks: 728
Thanked 1,398 Times in 969 Posts
|
I agree with you jeffk EXCEPT that I doubt if the Selectmen will care if they have to spend a lot of money on legal fees. It's not their money they are wasting. Now if it was THEIR money it might be a different story------
|
03-11-2015, 04:22 PM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
I want to hear more about what Clay had previously done regarding personal attacks on one of the BOS members' families. It was alluded to in only one of the newspaper articles.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|