View Single Post
Old 04-01-2022, 12:15 PM   #26
stingray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 59
Thanks: 192
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
I agree fairness is an issue and I do not know exactly what is fair in this case.

But it's kind of funny the way you call this an "unfunded government regulation" Can't we all agree that every person should be responsible for processing their own sewage? Some do this via public sewer, some via private septic, but the implication that it's the government's job to fund every sewage issue just seems off in an area where there is not universal public sewer.
A fair compromise might be all pay your own compliance reporting or have the city cover all with the tax base. I suspect an efficient centralized implementation would be the lowest cost to all if done properly. This might leave private septic on the outside; but, for the sake of the lakes; they should insure their system are sufficient to protect these local treasures.
stingray is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stingray For This Useful Post: