View Single Post
Old 04-01-2022, 11:58 AM   #25
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,211
Thanks: 1,112
Thanked 935 Times in 577 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
The issue at hand here is the who bears the burden of cost for an unfunded government regulation that seems to target a certain group of taxpayer?? These people pay the same tax rates and water/sewer rates.
I agree fairness is an issue and I do not know exactly what is fair in this case.

But it's kind of funny the way you call this an "unfunded government regulation" Can't we all agree that every person should be responsible for processing their own sewage? Some do this via public sewer, some via private septic, but the implication that it's the government's job to fund every sewage issue just seems off in an area where there is not universal public sewer.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote