View Single Post
Old 02-01-2021, 02:08 PM   #4
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
HB 229 is to only identify what defines a “Wake Boat”. Once it can be defined and identified it can be taxed at a higher rate, fined when laws are not followed, or eliminated altogether from NH lakes.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I have very mixed feelings on this issue. Obviously I care about the lake and it’s ecosystem and shoreline but eliminating a certain type of boat could lead to more and more regulation. I would need to see there proposed changes but I might not be opposed to a different set of setbacks from the shoreline and possibly some limiting the use to deeper parts of the lake. But again I a very much up in the air as I do not like over regulation.

Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post: