It's really easy to knock people down by saying "wrong!" "FAKE NEWS!" "jerk!" but if anyone wants to engage in a constructive debate, please bring some facts to the discussion.
Hold this against me, and I'm sure someone will, but I am not an expert. I admit I am not an expert. All I am doing is reading, digesting, and validating facts and data from multiple primary and secondary sources. If these sources turn out to be wrong, or inaccurate, or my interpretation is flawed, but all means offer alternatives. I will spin on a ****ing dime if they are better than the sources I'm using because my thoughts on this are not fixed and tribal.
So far the "alternative evidence" produced is:
- An OANN article (proven to be misleading at best, lies at worst)
- A quote from Dr Deborah Birx (asserted that she is being misleading by the author of the data she quotes)
- Assertions that "we just don't know" (which we all understand we don't know it all, but that doesn't mean we don't know anything)
- A conservative blog (opinions)
- Incomparable figures from driving and cancer deaths