Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles
TOW,
Thank you for your help. I have nothing against you for posting this. I have read and re-read your post of the law. I am not a lawyer nor a politician. Can someone that can read this garbage please interpret it and tell me and all of us in plain old common English what it means?
|
My understanding of the interpretation of the law that the DA is using is that a) the child was under fifteen years of age and did not have a firearms ID card, and b) the event was not "instruction"; therefore it was a violation of the law to "furnish" him a weapon and ammunition. The father, on the other hand, is permitted to furnish his child with a weapon under those those same conditions, provided it is for supervised use.