View Single Post
Old 07-10-2008, 09:23 AM   #74
Ryan
Senior Member
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mass/Gilford
Posts: 247
Thanks: 216
Thanked 70 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Islander View Post
If a lake is so crowded with "thrill-seeker" that it is not safe for children in a small boat then something has to change. And that change is the thrill-seekers have to go.
Exactly how many "thrill seeking" boats are on the lake causing this 'congestion' you speak of?

From what I've observed, they are the minority of the population on the lake, somewhere behind bowriders, cabin cruisers, bass boats, sailboats, jet skis, kayaks, canoes and floating trampolines.

Going back to my observations from my earlier post, with little or no MP presence during the busiest of boating weekends (last weekend), HB 847 is going to be extremely difficult to enforce and not the solution the SL crowd is looking for.
__________________
Please do not feel the trolls.
Ryan is offline