View Single Post
Old 01-17-2024, 01:58 PM   #5
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,214
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 936 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
Both bills will only cost waterfront homes money. A waterfront homeowner can be declared guilty without proof if a person in a kayak believes you disturbed your shoreline. The other bill requires waterfront property owners to have their septic system evaluated and repaired before a sale can be completed. Something others home are not subject too.
Say no to both bills


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
The DES guys have always been quite reasonable, I can't imagine that a random kayaker with no proof of violation is going to get anywhere.

I do agree that the septic rules will cost some homeowners some money. But I think this is one of those regulations where we REALLY want to make sure our next door neighbors are in compliance. We're swimming it! The law just requires them to inspect and fix a failed septic before they sell their house for millions of dollars. Aren't responsible homeowners having their septic maintained once every 5 years or so anyway?
FlyingScot is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post:
Sponsored Links