Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. V
I was trying to see if I understand the cast of characters, i.e. "who did what to whom."
I'd never heard of these people or this issue until I read this thread, and got most of my "facts" from the article in Mass Law Weekly, which was based on a summary I believe provided by lawyers for one of the parties.
My post was not a flame, it was more of an "Attaboy!"
I've no dog in this fight; I live 3000 miles away and when lakeside shop at Hannaford.
|
Thanks for clarifying the post. This is a complicated case that goes back over 30 years. There are some good articles out there that give an account of what happened. I just thought you were suggesting that Art T. had some hand in his father's behavior, or was complicit with his father in defrauding the other side of the family.
There's enough issues between the family in current times to write a book....and both sides have dirty hands, though Art T. has done such an amazing job with this business I can't imagine what the Art S. side of the family was thinking when it went after Art T.