I'm sure this will surface again next year because the HUB proponents just don't seem to want to take no for an answer.
Not being an eligible voter I didn't bother watching any of the meeting since I'm going to get a bill regardless of what was said and how the vote turned out.
What I wonder is if there's any thought by the HUB people of taking their proposal and dropping the two pools from the mix. I don't know what that would do to both the initial cost estimate as well as the ongoing operating expenses but I've got to believe it would drop considerably. Not sure if that swings more votes to yes if the cost is more reasonable but on the flip side that makes some of the yes votes go to no because people that don't have as much tax skin in the game are looking to get a cheap (to them) place to swim.
|