Quote:
Originally Posted by OCDACTIVE
"...(and yes EL we know your answer is #5, so no need for comment ) |
1)
Last I checked, this thread remains open to both sides for comments.
2)
My vote (and the votes of ALL of my family, my tenants, and many other lakeside—but unrecognized—tenants) is the same: #5.
(But see below).
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCDACTIVE
"...Anyone want to start the comments on what you think are the most plausible...?"
|
The previous suggestion for a reduction in exhaust noise was left off.
A promised reduction of "Exhaust Noise" could go a long way towards getting any compromise through legislation. (If, as opponents have contended, that noise was a factor in WinnFABS' "agenda").
I'll "liberalize" that compromise even more by adding that a boat that is
inaudible at six miles distance will be granted unlimited speeds on Winnipesaukee.
How about THAT? 
Those that fail (and had exceeded 65-MPH) will pay a fee to the NHMP at the rate of $100 per decibel over the present 86dB limit.
A different thread's suggestion of a "Lake Winnipesaukee-only-license" sounds like another valuable piece to add to the compromises previously stated.
IMHO.
