View Single Post
Old 06-16-2022, 03:02 PM   #23
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 529 Times in 435 Posts
Default

The proposed purpose is to have a positive impact on the lake.
The CO would most likely just shut it down and not impose the fines.

But if we wanted to do it year after year to have the desired impact... yes... it would require the permitting.

The fee can easily be waived as the purpose is of a public benefit.
And businesses can then further advertise and support through donates/volunteers to make the effort have some real long term impact.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote