View Single Post
Old 08-27-2007, 05:35 PM   #16
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 216
Thanked 484 Times in 278 Posts
Default I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc
To me the important problem is a boat traveling too fast in a very confined area. Even if a boat made no wake and was silent, you would still need the 150' rule. You still would not want it going through the channel at 30-40mph.
Even though the desired outcome of a no wake zone is to reduce wake, the implementation is by minimizing speed.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote