View Single Post
Old 02-04-2007, 11:12 PM   #23
Mickomally
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael clayton
they are leasing 22,000 sq ft. I worked for the supermarket mentioned for 11 years and it is not even half the size they require .I have the blueprints in my hands of the entire building..Brooks wanted and now Rite aid wants a drive thru for their pharmacy..the only way to do that is for wardos to leave,build a new pharmacy on the right end with drive thru. there is not enough clearance on the left side of the building .Rite aid will take the right end and lease the left side to someone like me,who wanted to put in a smalll supermarket ,,about 45 % larger than October Farms. the other problem is that there are only 214 parking spaces and the cinema uses a lot of those and the florist on the other end uses some consider that Rite aid needs some and there are not enough spaces left for a large store .If you add the sq. footage of the exhisting brooks/rite aid and combine it with the 12,788 sq ft where oct. farms was, you come up with the 22,500 sq ft + - that the owner is now offering to lease
Michael is 100% correct. The building itself is too small for even a small Walmart, and the lot itself is too small for a tear-down and a new Walmart to be built.
Like Michael I have intimate knowledge of this location, and I agree with him on this one. Sorry FLL! Maybe Walmart could build out on rte 104? You should give them a call

Michael, have you considered trying again to move forward with your idea? Perhaps the new ownership will be more helpful than the old ownership.
Mickomally is offline   Reply With Quote