Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Owen
I question the basis upon which you are forming an opinion about my reputation.
For the record, I applied for and obtained a lawful subdivision. It was granted.
It was appealed, and the Town reviewed the appeal and upheld the approval.
I reported serious pollution as a whistleblower. They sued me, claiming my truthful reporting was false. They spent a verified $440,000 alleging my statements were untrue and ultimately withdrew the case. That withdrawal speaks for itself, particularly after expending $440,000. My insurance provided $1.5 million in coverage, and in the course of that defense, additional acts of pollution were identified and substantiated.
Thirty adults — not children — were just feet from my door at 11 p.m. Startled, I came out of my house and yelled at them to protect myself. They attempted to have me jailed. The Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court decision.
I reported illegal and unpermitted construction that could have killed someone. The DES investigated, agreed with my concerns, and required proper design and permitting. The illegal and unsafe construction was dug up and redone under DES supervision.
So I step forward to protect human life, prevail in court, and follow lawful process — and yet my reputation is questioned.
All courts have ruled in my favor, and still my reputation is portrayed as questionable.
Please explain.
Thank you,
Randy Owen
|
It appears that you struggle to take a pragmatic approach to resolving issues. By understating your own actions while overstating your opponents, you foment divisiveness. There's so much "I this" and "I that".
Consequently, this has impacted your reputation and perceived motives. Your presence in this forum immediately raises flags because of this history.
There are other ways.
My perspective only - thank you for asking.