View Single Post
Old 02-07-2026, 05:13 PM   #168
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,942
Thanks: 795
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
"(5) Properties that are not habitable during the winter months due to lack of
winterization, such as the absence of adequate heating, insulation, or plumbing designed for sub
freezing temperatures, as certified by the owner or a qualified inspector."
The proposed amendment covers that.
And how many people would be able to afford to rent a house on the mainland that IS winterized and accessible? Most renters probably couldn't even pay for the heat.

John are you sure this bill was not your idea? You are certainly defending it with your life.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote