View Single Post
Old 01-18-2026, 01:52 PM   #89
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,980
Thanks: 3
Thanked 678 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tummyman View Post
1 New Section; Taxation; Persons and Property Liable to Taxation; Supplemental Residence Tax. Amend RSA 72 by inserting after section 6-a the following new section:

72:6-b Unoccupied Housing Tax. Any owner of property that is unoccupied for at least 6 months of the tax year, or is occupied as a short-term rental for at least 6 months of the tax year, shall be required to pay to the department of revenue administration a sum equal to the total of all property taxes, fees, and interest owed on that property to any municipality, city, town, village, or unincorporated place.


I really don't understand this change. First, there is no such RSA 72:6-a. 72:6-a was repealed in 1995. There is a 72:6, but no -a. Don't these folks read the RSA's or did I miss something?? Second, if you own a property and it is occupied for over 6 months by a family member, does this mean it complies? And what is a long term rental if over 6 months is a short term rental. And what about renting to a family member for some nominal rent? That would comply? Or if my property is in a trust, then the trust could rent it to me for over 6 months and it would comply? And what would occupy mean...the power is turned on? This whole thing is so political. If there is a revenue issue and the state needs to raise that money through property taxes, then add some sosrt of rate on ALL PROPERTY...residential and commercial. Fair is fair, not this BS tax on selected folks. It is so bad. If it comes to be, I suggest a group of non resident sue the state for violation of taxation without representation...there was a famous tea party about that way back when... and take it all the way to the Supreme Court. After all, everything in government gets there these days, so why not fill the pot with this issue. Time for folks to stop taking these abusive items and fight back. People should take their rights back and stop bowing to these folks. Just my opinion....
Yes. We can rent to a family member or even someone that we have house sit.
Under 6 months is a STR and should have a Meals & Room tax id and pay the taxes - some people ignore that. Over 6 months is a long term rental, and so not subject to the increase found in this bill.

The NH Constitution has had this option in effect for over 50 years. Corporation/businesses in NH pay lots of taxes to the State, County, and Local... they have no "representation" as you would determine in most or any of these.

We get the choice, pay or move.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote