Quote:
Originally Posted by coolyourjets
I’m not sure I understand your point. The Supreme Court didn’t do a study on voter fraud nor did they confirm its existence. What they did was to uphold a law, which exists in the State of Arizona, among others. As previously mentioned, each states voter laws are different and the Supreme Court upholding a law that gives the states rights to enforce their own laws has nothing to do with proving that something is a rampant problem
|
Arizona eliminated rampant ballot-harvesting, and inserted the much narrower "family" type collecting. Still, the SCOTUS had to pass judgment.
California, which borders Arizona, doesn't think voter-fraud is a problem.
Has there
ever been a "close" election that went "R"?
Wisconsin "finds" ballots after the election:
https://conservativemedia.com/news/w...arys-campaign/