Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Just Wonderin
Then why declare No Wake at all. Does the water miraculously become completely flat after the wake rolls for 600 feet. The lake is still one foot over full lake. We are in a flood state. Don't they get that? Many docks are still under water, many of the trees close to the shoreline have partially submerged bases, with wind or boat wakes, these trees could very easily fall.
I'd like to hear other's views on this declaration.
|
While I think 600 feet is probably inadequate too, I have no data to back it up and have to believe the rule was made in good faith and in everyone's interest, not just the lakefront land owners.
I can't help but think that if an extra 12" of water puts some trees at risk of falling, these are not trees we should put a lot of effort into saving. I say take them down and put something hardier in their place. They were a probably a mistake.