Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

TomC · 05-25-2006, 07:25 PM

..what everyone meant by "no wake lake-wide"? Was this what happened in the earlier "no wake" periods (i wasn't around the lake in 84, and i don't recall the 98 incident very well...)

600 ft instead of 150 ft doesn't seem to be much of a "decision"

05-25-2006, 07:25 PM	#10
TomC Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Lakes Region Posts: 816 Thanks: 42 Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts	is the 600 ft "no wake" exclusion.. ..what everyone meant by "no wake lake-wide"? Was this what happened in the earlier "no wake" periods (i wasn't around the lake in 84, and i don't recall the 98 incident very well...) 600 ft instead of 150 ft doesn't seem to be much of a "decision"