View Single Post
Old 08-16-2016, 04:37 PM   #11
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,600
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,462
Thanked 1,983 Times in 1,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
They would have been better off simply raising the price of their wine and keeping their mouth shut about the "surcharge". It's business 101 that as labor or material prices increase so does the price of the product being sold. To call it a surcharge against their customers is simply bad business and just plain stupid.

Dan
I agree, Dan. Raise the price. A 3.5% increase on a $20 bottle of wine raises the price to $20.70; a $40 bottle of wine goes up to $41.40 . It seems to me to be either a "feel good" change; tell the employees that they are getting a raise, and price the wine accordingly. If someone likes their product (s) , they will buy it. Just don't go public with the raises and then tell me that I can still drink their wine, as long as I pay a 3.5% surcharge for that privilege.

I live here... I am always Upthesaukee.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to upthesaukee For This Useful Post: