The silence here from the opposition about the "facts" put forth in this article is pretty deafening. Is SP's rather Simian reply the official response? Are you all agreeing that the position of your man in Glendale, who has absolutely no experience enforcing a boating speed limit, who has buddied up with the very "hens" that he is supposed to be guarding, and who has lost all credibility with statements like "200 miles an hour is just fine on our lakes", rather than that of a real safety-conscious law enforcement official who has a proven track record of success enforcing an identical law for years, and local public officials there who brag about the benefits that their identical law has brought to their region, their ecomony, their tourism, their quality of life, and their overall boating experience? That sounds like a winning approach to me.
It just seems so selfish to continue to try to deny to us the same benefits that the citizens out there are enjoying just so you can drive your boats really fast.
Woodsy, Doesn't this meet the requirements you set for changing your opinion? Are you a man of your word?
|