Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Island Lover
I didn't indicate we spoke for everybody, I indicated we spoke for both sides.
Unfortunately you did not see the evidence. If you had I don't think you would be saying the things you are.
And if you knew more about how computers and this forum work you would know there is no way to know if one person voted more than once.
It is also very possible, as has been pointed out, that BOTH sides could have cheated. That is why the results are not valid.
|
You said "both sides" agree, not two individuals from both sides, the posts are very clear, you spoke for everyone and now that you have been called on it you don't like it.
I wish you would explain and detail this so called evidence so I could elevate myself to the intellectual level at which you feel you exist. I'm always troubled by people who say if you only knew what I knew then you would understand, usually these people know nothing, maybe you're different.
You are very quick to dismiss the results that don't support your position while on the other hand had the results supported your position you would have fought tooth and nail to defend them even though the same questions would have existed. ( How did I know that? Truth is I don't but I figured I would state my theory on how you would have behaved as fact, just like you state your theories as fact.)
So, it is also very possible that nobody cheated and the results truly represent the public sentiment or a few knuckleheads cheated from each side offsetting each other. Once more, a call from another forum for people to come to this forum to vote, does not constitute cheating.